LEADERSHIP AND FOLLOWERSHIP
Introduction
This research paper aims at providing several scholarly definitions and the verified explanations of what followership and leadership are. The affairs of the different understandings of leadership are vital when looking into the possibility related to the knowledge of the societal values, which rise from the different explanations of leadership derived from the defined variables. A preview of the scholarly articles on leadership determined depending on the matter of familiarity with leadership concerns. The conjoined explanations of leadership are primary in familiarizing with the spectrum of leadership. The descriptions of leadership and followership are as well helpful in bringing out new reviews and perceptions on the matter of the development of followership and leadership programs in the community nowadays (Collinson, 2017). Over the decades, people have disregarded the gone reviews and prescriptions of leadership due to training in research about leadership. These attributes happen via the study of the programs of social sciences helpful in getting the association in occurrences of social research. Collinson (2017) additionally analyzed the miniature of definitions of leadership that acknowledged leadership as to be developed on two basics, which are process and behaviors. The above two aspects were crucial in designing the leadership model, which is vital. Consequently, the prescriptions and perception of followership and leadership are primary in raising the context of leadership in the community.
Leadership
A leader explains one, two or even more people who can choose, give and dominate over many followers who have different abilities and abilities and making the followers attain the missions and goals of the organization that makes followers to readily enlarge the physical and emotional energy in a harmonized attempt to attain the organizational objectives. The leader could achieve the followers’ influence by fetching the beset vision of the coming days with the values and principles of the followers, which are essential in expounding the future action procedures. In the leadership process, the leaders provide the vision to the present companies’ vision and using the vital thinking skills and expertise, awareness, and usages of mutual communication, such as active listening and positive discourse, which improve followers’ principles and thoughts.
The leaders can attain their aggregate insights with the followers via honest ways and encouraging better goods within the followers. They are desired to acknowledge the followers’ differences, which are essential in attaining the specific values and objectives devoid of disturbance by the uniqueness of people. The leaders have the capability of attaining their missions via standard flexible ideas of educating, protection, and support of the followers.
Additionally, the leaders are supposed to influence the meaning and importance of gatherings outside the general company’s process and show their implications to the company’s objectives and purpose. The trait theory and the theory of the great man are among the ancient models and theories of leadership. Leadership is concerned with more than one person. According to the grand man theory, leaders are persons conjoined with immense attributes and brave abilities. The trait theory explains the particular leaders as people who bare specific attributes that enable people to be great leaders.
The grand man theory specifies that people are equipped with essential attributes of leadership; however, the trait theory gives a stand for measurable attributes such as psychological, race, and gender factors. As maintained by the literature study by van Dick and Junker, the objective of the two theories is established on the persons. However, leadership can be given via a group of persons. For example, the senior employee groups cover a team of individuals who accomplish the different duties and leadership processes but work very collectively contrary to working as an individual.
The importance of choosing the appropriate people to attain success in the coming days was discussed by Oc and Bashshur in 2013. The aspect was elaborated and supported for leaders to dictate the leadership capabilities and powers in the process of leadership. It was recorded that leadership isn’t based on a single individual; rather, it concerns concentrating on the followers to attain the objectives and mission of the company. The innovational leaders are capable of moving above the persona likes in favor of the whole organization. However, they further stated that leadership concerned with serving should concentrate on choosing the followers to attain noticeable goals and missions. The two leaderships (Servant and transformation leadership), fits in the present-day perception of leadership programs and process.
The leadership simulation is said to produce a well-arranged effort and implication of the behaviors of the follower. The environment is a vital aspect that affects the future of environments on which chances are perceived to be critical in a short while. With steady and easily predictable environments that are important in raising the followers’ performance by enlarging the level of trust and determination with the followers. The matter of the challenges for the leaders and the companies helpful in inciting the best for the followers is expounded by Oc and Bashshur. Those kinds of explanations about leadership are in line with systems theory that donates to the well-organized efforts to attain the overall leadership goals. Thus, the collaboration among followers and coordinated efforts are vital in attaining the collaborative objectives in the process of leadership.
For a long time, leadership was acknowledged as an individual’s quality. Vast philosophers couldn’t draw clear explanations on leadership, but they inspire the leaders to be extra moral and interact well with the surrounding people. As stated by Confucius, the main objective of a leader is service to the people surrounding them. A leader should be an individual who bears great virtues and wise to attract his people’s support. According to Epitropaki, during the 19th century, recurring concepts on leadership were related to the theory of the great man. During the times, the leadership philosophers begin to offer importance to the followers in the leadership process. For instance, leadership is a mingling between the teams, which include prohibiting of situations and the followers’ expectations.
The importance of leaders formulating a vision and sharing it amongst other persons was noted by Uhl-Bien et al. A leader extends a vision that gives a precise point on the duties of other individuals. Those elements happen via the study of programs of social sciences helpful in the comprehension of associations in occurrences of social research. The schemes of explanations of leadership that acknowledge leadership as being related to two aspects, such as process and behaviors, were also reviewed. These two concepts were vital in the modeling of leadership, which is primary. The same scholarly works also urged that leadership was concerned with the association process linked to the collective objective achievement. This kind of leadership approach is vital in impacting associations between the followers and the leaders to offer essential changes, which includes their common objectives.
Followership
Just like leadership, there are several explanations related to followership. On many occasions, followership is explained as the reflector of the process of leadership. The root point is if followers do not support leaders, the leaders cannot work well. To a greater extend, the association of the leaders and the followers are in line with democracy. Followership should be acknowledged as leadership.
Followership has three significant attributes, which are charisma, personality, and competence. Leadership and integrity values are vital for followers in impacting followership. Followership is vital in defining the implications of leadership. As indicated by the research work of Oc and Bashshur (2013), leadership gives strength to the aspect of socialization between leaders and followers. According to Philips, followership and leadership include two concepts of definitions of followership.
In the presence of good followers, the leaders will be annoyed by people talking to themselves. It was noted that great followership is vital in the promotion of democracy other than extra leadership. Boundless followership is hard than leadership. It has more threats and less payment. Additionally, Philips noted that inconsistent association between leaders and followers bears the power of swapping the duties of the leaders and followers. In those circumstances, the duty of the followers can be viewed as the power to access and undertake suitable leadership duties.
Regarding the mutual relationship between leaders and followers, a more magnificent model of combining followership and leadership, which is concerned more with optimizing efficiency in the companies (Collinson, 2017). The definition of followership is essential and is useful in evaluating the followership-leadership relationship. The participation of the changing simulation of followership aims to identify the two simulations on how to define followership. The two simulations include the aspect of followers and the specific attributes of followers in the promotion of efficient followership. They were capable of looking into the changing concept of the social growth of followership.
The aspect of followership is vital in countering the dissentient theories in the leadership procedure inside the company. Regarding the concepts of a person’s duties, there are three active duties of followership, such as shifting, independent, and interactive. They further developed that those three duties drive to the efficiency of the follower-leader engagement. The main focus is the usefulness of followers in expanding the different duties and could make the process of leadership neutral. With an independent objective, the follower could make active responsibilities to clasp circumstances on the undertaking of tasks.
The two followership’s models were distinguished as active and passive, by Collinson. The variation between passive and active is strengthening the followers in the process of making decisions. Active followership gains more exceptional ability and participation in helping the leaders to form critical decisions. On the contrary, passive followership is concerned with following orders given by the leaders. Mixing the two followership aspects, passive and active, it was argued that there are five patterns related to followership, such as sheep, alienated, survivors, yes-people, and followers. The main designs of followership are essential in embracing the negative and positive characteristics of followership.
Getting the meaning of the impression of behaviors and attitudes of followership is essential. The kinds of followers taken into records are resources, individualists, partners, and implementers. The followers are duties while implementers gain executive support to dare the extend of norms and values. It was further argued that the followers’ behaviors are related to the leaders’ behaviors. A great follower must have the ability to accept considerable risks and bold to take vital upright steps when needed to. The concept of leadership helps understand the two aspects, such as process and behaviors. Such two aspects were important in modeling leadership, which is vital.
Organizational structures should be responsible for the promotion of the duty of the followers. (Walia et al., 2015). The followers are essential in assisting the leaders in taking appropriate decisions. The leaders must strengthen the followers to evaluate the procedure and making necessary changes in integrating the present circumstance to raise the general performance. Non-rigid followership is crucial and always useful in the promotion of responsibility via good hiring. Some of the uncommon abilities of followers are active engagement and crucial thinking. It was held that an ethical implication for the exercise of great followership is primary in offering positive donations towards the founding of excellent functioning, organizational groupings with continued programs for quality improvement.
Followership has to be given duties as leadership. Research work clarified that leadership requires willful followership. Extra acknowledgment and robust investment would be offered to the growth of followers in research or the educational stage. According to Northouse, bold followership has to be concerned with the company’s norms, particularly in the types of qualities of leadership. Followership can be perceived as the possible power balance, in neutralizing the negative implications of leadership inside the company’s structure.
Across the entire followership’s history, the different happenings can be evaluated on how boldly followers assisted in changing the horrible tyrant and its great rebellion, embracing the known impression of humanity. The responsibility of the leader to embrace response from the followers is vital in changing the compromising effects of the leaders. According to Uhl-Bien, there are other simulations of leadership explanations that acknowledge leadership as to be related to tow aspects, such as process and behaviors. The above aspects were important in modeling leadership, which is crucial. Leaders should portray constructive behavior towards the followers because they act an essential role in evaluating the truths. The leaders should positively understand and have the right attitude towards followers to act appropriately towards the improvement of the process of followership.
Conclusion
To summarize, the explanations of followership and leadership are crucial in the improvement of the performance and productivity in the community. Many people have disregarded the perception and definitions of leadership due to education on research about leadership. Those concepts happen via the expansion of the programs associated with social science helpful in getting the meaning of the relationships in social research happenings. Figuring out followership is crucial and is useful in evaluating the follower-leader association. The participation of the non-rigid simulation of followership aims at identifying two concepts on the process of determining followership. The two concepts are the attributes of followers and the aspects of followers to improve followership.
References
Nyström, J. (2017). Leadership and Culture: A comparison between Finland and Germany.
Western, S. (2019). Leadership: A critical text. SAGE Publications Limited.
Williams, W. A., Brandon, R. S., Hayek, M., Haden, S. P., & Atinc, G. (2017). Servant leadership and followership creativity. Leadership & Organization Development Journal.
