Love
First Reading
We are ever reminded about the importance and power of love throughout our lives. Our friends, families, and social institutions such as churches, government as well as schools and through media and literature, we are unceasingly reminded concerning love. Love is a conception that has generally played a task in communication as well has permitted people to link, irrespective of their places and backgrounds. Since love is shared and it has become rooted in human lives, it is a significant drive in dialogue as well as communication. In this essay, we talk about the way love has eased communication and the way it has been able to acclimate several circumstances. The author examines the way love through an anthropological as well as values and cultures (Brown et al., 2020).
An anthropologist’s attitude looks at the human as a social being who is molded by society. Because of the nature of love, together with its capability to convoy a general message, love has successfully been applied as a tool to enhance communication. Love is diverse and is not limited to feelings; rather, it is enriched with several attributes that strengthen us to conceive it to be ethically sound. Some of these attributes are not limited to loyalty as well as humility and may be found among different relationship. For instance, the relationship between a neighbor and a man shows the way love does not require to be limited to family love or romantic love. This indicates that by naturally treating a neighbor with respect and good manners, one shows love. This concept is connected to norms as well as values, which encourages citizens to engage in enhancing better communication. Paulo Freire’s Pedagogy of the Oppressed, is an example of low can be used in conversation (Freire and Paulo, 2018).
Second reading
Love is a potent tool; it shapes lives. But we also have true love, and what is it? Paul has faith that love is kind, patient, and love is not self-seeking. Paul says that love never fails from (1 Corinthians 13:8). From another viewpoint of John, Jesus Christ laid his life down for all humans, and this is how we understand what love is (1 John 3:16).In the same book, John declares that any person who is able to love has the knowledge of who God is. Thus, love is not defined as being one thing; instead, love is more than feeling, and it is day-to-day self-denial. From the bible, Jesus is the most exceptional instance of love. We can appreciate splendid sacrifices for many or even in just a simple phone call.
In Steve Wonder’s hit, “I just called to say I love you,” talks on love, which is a simple phone call song. The song is a simple phone call to someone special to simply express love to the special person. Steve wonders in his song he stresses that there is no critical occasion for the request. He says that it is another ordinary day and not no new year day nor Christmas, and He shows us love that love has no exact time to be expressed, love is supposed to be present in one’s life in every word and actions (Cloud et al.,2017).
Part 3
Poem
William Shakespeare Sonnet 134 analysis
Sonnet 134 is one of the 154 sonnets that were written by William Shakespeare, who is an English poet, as well as a playwright. In the sonnet 134, the speaker confronts the dark lady after knowing that she has seduced the fair youth.
Here, the story of the poet’s friend’s seduction reveals in sonnet 134. Expecting to benefit the favor from the woman, the rhymester sends a friend to the lady with a text. Nevertheless, the woman seizes the chance to make the friend her lover, and the friend accepts the opportunity to be the lover.
The poem admits to his mistress that because he has accepted that his friend belongs to her too (the poet ends sonnet 133 saying that the two belong to his mistress) and he as well is legally bound to satisfy he desires and also needs (Leyland et al., 2018). The poet does not mind forfeiting himself to the mistress on the condition that she will allow his friend to relieve him of his difficulty. But he knows well that mistress will not accept this request which is the reason his friend does not want to be allowed “But thou will not, nor he will not be free,” this is because the mistress she is too selfish. In contrast, his friend is generous in the line”For thou art covetous, and he is kindhearted,” The friend got trapped because he was attempting to liberate the poet and was behaving like a guarantor for the poet which fascinated him to the mistress of the poet the same way the poet “ Under that bond that him as fast doth bind.”
The poet compares her to a moneylender, that she will extract the gains as well as the merits of being beautiful “The statutes of thy beauty thou wilt take,” she as well loans her body to the poet and friend so that she can use them. The poet blames himself because the mistress used him to seduce his friend: apparently, he and friend are evolved with the mistress (Leyland et al.,2018). According to the poet, guiltlessness, together with naïve elucidates the manner friend, although he fears that he has lost both mistress and his friend, on the other hand, mistress she has gained both of them.
Created around usury image is loaning at a high-interest rate. Sonnet 134 has bawdy expressions such as the second line, which presents pun on the word ” will,” which meant lust or desire according to the Elizabeth times; The poet is mortgaged, which is a term used as security (Johnson and Keith,2019).
In summary, the poet admits that both he, together with the friend, is at the mistress for mercy, then in the second one, he surmises that the attachment will have to hold because of his friend naïve as well as mistress possession. The rest of the poem portrays that mistress is an unprincipled usurer: symbolically, she lent her beauty to the poet as well picked his friend as interest.
Work cited
Brown, Scott, et al. “Come Follow Me—Podcast# 22 “Continue Ye in My Love,” John 13-17.” Sign, (2020).
Cloud, Henry, and John Townsend. Boundaries Updated and Expanded Edition: When to Say Yes, How to Say No To Take Control of Your Life. Zondervan, 2017.
Freire, Paulo. Pedagogy of the oppressed. Bloomsbury Publishing USA, 2018.
Johnson, Keith. Shakespeare’s Language: Perspectives Past and Present. Routledge, 2019.
Leyland, James, and James Goding. Who Will Believe My Verse?: The Code in Shakespeare’s Sonnets. Australian Scholarly Publishing, 2018.
Stirling, Brents. The Shakespeare sonnet order: poems and groups. Univ of California Press, 1968.