This essay has been submitted by a student. This is not an example of the work written by professional essay writers.
Uncategorized

UTOPIA: POSSIBILITY OF UTOPIA

This essay is written by:

Louis PHD Verified writer

Finished papers: 5822

4.75

Proficient in:

Psychology, English, Economics, Sociology, Management, and Nursing

You can get writing help to write an essay on these topics
100% plagiarism-free

Hire This Writer

 

 

 

 

 

 

UTOPIA: POSSIBILITY OF UTOPIA

Student name

Course

Professor name

Date

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Introduction

The idea of Utopia is possible through the enhancement of the human condition. Utopia is an imagined place, society, or community where nearly everything is perfect such that it focuses on the equality in the government, justice, and the economy. By consideration of the article “Men before the Mirror” by Hopkins and the text “Marcel Duchamp’s Fountain,” by William, this paper argues that Utopia is not possible in modern society.

The text “Men before the mirror” examines the extent to which Duchamp dealt with male subjectivity and male psychology. The switches in the gender view of the “Men Before the mirror” arguably depict a deconstructive society which is inscribed of gender positions as Hopkins suggest that the relationship between the text of Duchamp or Rrose to the photograph of Man Ray portray a culture of pure masculinity (Hopkins, 1998). The textual readymade suggests that Utopia is possible when the society involved is subjected to psychological manipulations that alter its current objectivity.

The creation and presentation of the fountain by Duchamp could have been a way of testing the tolerance and commitment of the American society in the freedom of expression to the new concepts of arts introduced. It is clear from the article that both arts of Duchamp bring about psychological coherence and order to a life where everyone tries to account or attribute things into a new perspective. The fountain was a masterpiece that strongly supported the gendered character and subjecting society to different values, beliefs, and attention (Camfield, 1990).

Conclusion

Utopia in a society can be addressed by justifying gender rights and equality and the provision of intellectual and rational personalities. Hence, a society characterized by modern intervention does not support utopianism. I believe that both the “fountain” and the “men before the mirror” are a significant consequence of the history of a society.

 

 

 

 

 

 

WORK CITED

Camfield, W. A. (1990). Marcel Duchamp’s fountain: Its history and aesthetics in the context of 1917. Marcel Duchamp: Artist of the century.

Hopkins, D. (1998). Men before the mirror: Duchamp, Man Ray, and masculinity. Art History, 21(3), 303-323.

 

  Remember! This is just a sample.

Save time and get your custom paper from our expert writers

 Get started in just 3 minutes
 Sit back relax and leave the writing to us
 Sources and citations are provided
 100% Plagiarism free
error: Content is protected !!
×
Hi, my name is Jenn 👋

In case you can’t find a sample example, our professional writers are ready to help you with writing your own paper. All you need to do is fill out a short form and submit an order

Check Out the Form
Need Help?
Dont be shy to ask