Trait approach has a always concerned most people
There are a lot of leadership theories. Some of them I agree with, others I don’t. This paper will discuss the trait approach and transformational theory. Trait approach has a always concerned most people due to the manner in which they relate.
The trait approach identifies characteristics and traits of someone who could be a good leader. The trait approach was also studied by Kirkpatrick and Locke (1995). They concluded that leaders possess definite traits, and like Stogdill, they associated effectiveness with the situation and actions of the leader. The leader must set goals, be a role model, and develop a vision. Not everyone who has these traits will be leaders but they could be if they wanted to because companies need effective leaders.
The other leadership approach important today is the transformational theory. This is my favorite theory. A leader who is transformational is inspirational to work with because he or she motivates the employees. I believe a leader should be educated. This person helps followers think like leaders. The transformational leader works with his or her people, so employees feels part of a team. The followers trust and respect. This is the kind of leadership needed today because so many workers feel as if they are taken advantage of; they hate their jobs. If companies want to keep good workers, they have to have more leaders who are transformational. People don’t put up with being disrespected at work anymore. These two leadership theories are appropriate for the contemporary business world. A person must possess positive moral characteristics to be a leader, and they must treat workers fairly. Transformational leadership is important in today’s organizations. If a company wants to stay in business, they must take into account the need for effective leaders and hire the right people for the job.
The mode of the text is quite had to understand. There are so many grammatical errors making it hard for a person to understand the text. The words used in beginning the sentence are out of context, making the topic to be grammatically wrong. It lacks communicative effectiveness, and its nature is different from its true meaning. The writer in the text does not focus on the text which they are supposed to write on. They are very chatty in whatever they say, making it hard for a person to understand what is in the text. The topic is hardly outlined hence bringing the subject of what it should entail. There are complete grammatical errors in all the sentences, therefore, making it hard for a person to understand what the topic truly intrigues. Pronoun use has also been misused all over the text, making it hard to comprehend. The level at which the first person is used is contrary to the rules f essay writing. However, this has been so prevalent in the text bringing a different meaning to the understanding of the text.
The writer also does not emphasize so much on what is entailed in the context. The writer focuses on a precise manner to analyze the context. And this, therefore, changes the whole meaning of the text, which had proved hard to comprehend. It is less of an informative essay and focuses more on the description of the issue. The worth choice in the whole grammar was poor. Most of the people will not, therefore, be able to understand the entire topic as it has quite a lot of issues. Therefore grammatical errors need to be addressed so that they can adequately address all the issues which are crucial in the essay. The essay has been heavily manipulated in such a way that its grammar is hard to understand as it is not coherent.
The topic, in this instance, is not well outlined. And this is because the grammar analysis is not proper. Therefore the work is so formal, and therefore understanding what the topic is hard. Consequently, the lack of a complete structure is evident as sentence fragments are visibly incomplete. The choice was carefully factored after analyzing a variety of things. The grammar of the essay was vital. And this is because it was not thoroughly examined and, therefore, hard to understand. The topic was, therefore, fully understood as there was quite a significant form of the way it was supposed to be appreciated, bring the topic to be quite practical. Grammatical errors were widespread in the whole paper and t6hus, bringing the topic of it to be understood in better terms. Different speeches were approved and fully understood. The punctuations were also a vital issue hence hard to determine.
The word choice in this essay is also extremely according to what is required in this expertise field. The universal language is exceptionally formal, making it hard to understand what the paper implies. The huge grammatical error complicates the matter, therefore, influencing the understanding of the work. The essay is also extraordinarily general and consequently hard to understand what the writer wants. And this thus creates a huge task of understanding the whole paper as it has too many widespread formats that should be critically analyzed and, therefore, well understood. And this, therefore, has a significant impact on the topic. The writer does not clearly outline all the issues that affect the paper; therefore, it becomes hard to understand. The tenor is also absolutely submissive and not at all clear on what is supposed to be understood in the essay details.
Task 4
Notably, there are magnificent leadership theories. Arguably, most of them are agreeable. The main aim of another paper is to discuss the trait approach and also the transformational theory. The trait approach is always considered crucial due to how people relate.
The trait approach identifies the characteristics and traits of someone who could be a good leader. According to Kirkpatrick and Locke (1995), this is when the trait approach was studied. They concluded that leaders possess definite traits, and like Stogdill, they associated effectiveness with the situation and actions of the leader. The leader must set goals, be a role model, and develop a vision. Not everyone who has these traits will be leader while but, they could be if they wanted to because companies need effective leaders.
Besides, the other leadership approach critical today is the transformational theory. A transformational leader is also inspirational; therefore, easy to work with as they can quickly motivate the workers. Hence, ensuring that the job is done in a better manner. A leader must be highly educated to be respectable. Therefore influence people to have a mentality just like the leaders. And this kind of leadership needed today because so many workers feel as if they are taken advantage of; they hate their jobs. If companies want to keep good workers, they need to have more leaders who are transformational. People do not tolerate disrespect at work. These two leadership theories are appropriate for the contemporary business world. A person must possess positive moral characteristics to be a leader, and hence treat workers fairly. Transformational leadership is essential in today’s organizations. If a company wants to stay in business, they must take into account the need for effective leaders and hire the right people for the job.
Task 5
The changes made were quite general. They were meant to address the issues on the mode. And this was quite prevalent due to the issues of grammar. Grammatical challenges had affected the whole paper; therefore, they needed to be addressed with immediate effect. And this was mainly attributed to the fact that the text could not be understood as it, therefore, required to be addressed. Outstandingly, the format of the descriptive nature in which the sentences started was a significant issue that needed to be addressed. Therefore I generally deployed transitional phrases and conjunctions, which were essential in transforming the sentences to be understandable. The nature of the sentences, especially how they started, needed to be changed as they were very wrong. Most of the words that were used in the text were extremely biased. Therefore this was altered, making it crucial for the nature of the text to be hard to understand. Most of what the implicated was what they thought and therefore did not consider the facts. Thus I eradicated most of the biased elements and focused on the circumstances.
The text was also highly contradictory and, therefore, quite hard to comprehend. Thus the most crucial thing that I was able to address was to remove the contradictory segments, therefore, ensuring that the text was highly understandable. In most cases, it is quite hard to understand a specific context that is not well outlined. Thus after the paper was addressed, there were no significant issues as it was easily understandable the text, which was mainly meant for the public, needed to be addressed. I also punctuated the paper better. And this was because it was not easy to understand. The punctuation created so many grammatical errors. The was also a great use of passive voice. And this is not mainly allowed in most of the academic papers; therefore, finding a way to eradicate this issue was crucial in the way it helped in reading the paper. Thus the essential nature was so important in addressing different social issues as they happen in grammar analysis.
Additionally, the text was not easy to understand; therefore, it had to be paraphrased. And this was meant to make it easy to understand to most people as they did not find any other way in which they would understand the text. Therefore the paraphrasing made the paper more comfortable, and therefore, most of the individuals in the society could easily understand it. The use of the first in the text was also quite prevalent, which is against essay writing. Therefore I eradicated most of them and created a better text. The sentence subject agreement was also a significant issue that needed to be addressed. Accordingly, I dealt with it, creating a better understanding of the topic. The text was hard to comprehend by most of the people. And this is because of its word choice and use. Therefore I changed my selection on the words to understand the topic better. And this created a meaningful understanding of the topic, helping both parties to fully understand what it fully implied, which was crucial in understanding the better. Therefore the writing is completed understandable in all social contexts. They can, therefore, understand it better as it is quite vital.