the New Era as a local version of the global tradition of theoretical and political reactions to industrial capitalism and urbanization
A fifth and last section shows the New Era as a local version of the global tradition of theoretical and political reactions to industrial capitalism and urbanization. Bender reflects on the Political Agenda itself and the regional trade. He correctly stresses the degree to which the mechanisms of collective understanding and communication have influenced the trajectory of all cultures into modernity, taking the pieces of the globe closer together.
Although it focuses on specific topics, it remains a descriptive rather than a particular piece of writing. A country between nations provides a compelling appeal to put U.S. history in a global sense. Bender contextualizes America for a twofold reason: he reveals that the critical challenges of U.S. history are things that have spanned the globe. When well as these comparisons with similar problems and different results, Bender presents us with insights into how global relations have influenced America and other cultures. Nonetheless, some might also suspect Bender of being too nation-centered, one may wonder if it has lengthy passages about centuries before the American Revolution. This is undoubtedly accurate that the period around 1500 marked the beginning of world civilization. He may have stressed the latter, considering the cyclical predominance of the first radical and then conservative conceptions of the administration.
It seems to me, eventually, that a chapter on religions, their relations with the state and culture, will be a fascinating story to pursue. Bender has achieved a great deal. A country of nations succeeds in showing how much the integration of national history can do when it gets placed in a global context. This method of synthesis and aggregation is a new frontier in the international discourse on these topics.