Digitalization And Humanoid Susceptibility
Different from the olden time’s digitalization in the 21st century has impacted individuals from all wakes of life largely. Piece by piece, the internet, mobile phones abolishes the true definition of human connections, detaching us from the biosphere and directing us to a looming milieu of segregation. Alternatively, we make calls, text, and email or flash message avatars to express our feeling or moods instead of spending personal time with our allies. Such alternatives look and feel simpler; however, we lose the essential part of relationships with family or a friend, which is face time.
Handheld devices have invaded our homes, offices, zoo-time, and other social areas and topics such as dating where the good old dating is no longer critical as too much talking is involved. On the contrary, information fed on an individual online is enough to judge the individual one will date, and rejection loses its meaning as individuals have a dozen choices to choose. Furthermore, individuals have become so obsessed with technology, that one cannot stay without checking their phone for calls or messages in case they missed it (Powers, 2012). Also, breaking relationships has become so simplified as persons unfriend each other digitally without meeting or hiding away from individuals through the blocking sections.
Normalcy, in this era, necessitates being in a state where an individual is connected to the world through technology, while the lack of the same makes an individual look backdated (Powers, 2012). However, Turkle (2012) reiterates that we are handing over all our power to robotics thinking we are trying to connect, but we are only leading ourselves to a life of loneliness. Besides, digital devices not only change what we do in our lives but change who we are as we depend solely on what other people say about us more through the bits of information we have issued (Turkle, 2012). Also, even though we know how to communicate in social media, we forgo how to talk to each other. Additionally, parents have brought up a generation that has the negligible practice of sitting for dinner or communicating with their allies without handheld gadgets. Although human beings a robust and could easily show emotions after a few days without devices as human beings are wired to interconnect vocally, it is still a threat to how parentages have raised progenies.
Communication means giving full attention to the person individuals are interactive. However, most individuals communicate without face time, cutting up information which is often controlled (Turkle, 2012). Moreover, talking digitally, with automated digital voices such as Siri, is because of the individual’s thirst for the need to be heard since everyone else is too busy to listen. Besides, most parents have also lost how to be verbally connected with their children even when they are physically around as some tend to do chores while communicating online. Moreover, even though interacting through gadgets is not wrong, it does not convey the message as precisely and as interactive as verbally would. Plus, keying information brings about a different meaning than when the same message would have been delivered vocally.
Relationships, whether familial, romantic, friendly, or even societal, can be very chaotic and challenging; however, the same offers s rich sense of belonging that does not compare to the feelings associated with technology. Most individuals use devices as a way to connect to the outside world as the world feels more “accepting and understanding.” However, this is not the case as even though only bids of information are given online, the human being is judgmental, and the more one keeps connecting online, the more he gets disconnected to the real world leading to loneliness (Turkle, 2012). Additionally, replacing humanoid relationships for robotic relationships just for mere connections robs individuals of chances to know each other on a more personal level.
Companies and hospitals also have lost touch as well due to hand devices and computerized systems that handle business with minimal contact. Hospitals have screens that doctors look into having little or no eye contact, companies, on the other hand, have employees or employers who are so busy on their mobile phones during board meetings as they excuse themselves from sending emails. Real conversations are real and happen in real-time; however, digital communications are edited, retouched to perfection to fit societal preferences, and rob ourselves of real heartfelt conversations and interactions (Turkle, 2012).
Although most official work is done more efficiently and fast through our digital gadgets forming equilibrium by taking a break by using old methods like writing down or drafting ideas provides much needed offline time (Powers, 2012). Additionally, during board meetings, drafting down plans ensures that individuals are not distracted, ultimately resulting in a more productive and efficient assembly. Also, being flexible and adapting to the new life as powers(2012) says that just as the eras before had innovations and persons embraced the pen and paper method to communicate, so the persons in this era should adapt to the digital inventions as it is another historical development.
Getting control back from robotic devices by switching off all digital gadgets is the best approach to get time to reconnect again to individuals. Moreover, even though the technology is one of the best inventions made by man to ease the workload, it interferes with not only relationships but an individual’s ability to amalgamate views (powers, 2012) artistically. The regular mortal in today’s culture longs the connectedness that is made available by digital devices; therefore, an individual’s dreads retreats that have nullity in-network services. According to powers (2012), wisdom grounds us in the world, subsequently giving affluence, totality, and augments jobs and relationships. However, while it is the most indispensable element of a decent existence, and a unique potential we esteem majorly in others, digitalization is its enemy (Powers, 2012).
Society being digitally busy is a threat to solid relationships as individuals are busy making ghost appearances digitally, although they are physically present in their homes (Turkle, 2012). Actual productivity depends solely on the cognitive skills of an individual; nevertheless, society believes that digital devices are tools for productivity. Digitalization permits access to entities so fast that we do not get the chance to experience any contact as we click away from one link to another; nevertheless, Turkle (2012) says that we can still redesign how we built and implement our digital devices.
Many times we have given up our interactive relationships for poor connections digitally, but being single issues a chance to find ourselves. Additionally, we are so besotted with digital machinery. We are frightened to converse verbally as we are afraid too much talk will disintegrate amorousness, and we become petrified of being alone. Nevertheless, solitude gives us the chance to become creative.