the cost and prevalence of skin cancer in the United States
Source #1: Guy Jr, G. P., Machlin, S. R., Ekwueme, D. U., & Yabroff, K. R. (2015). Prevalence and costs of skin cancer treatment in the US, 2002− 2006 and 2007− 2011. American journal of preventive medicine, 48(2), 183-187. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amepre.2014.08.036
Summary
The source is original research on the cost and prevalence of skin cancer in the United States in two periods, between 220 to 2006 and 2007 to 2011. According to the author, skin cancer is the most common type of cancer affecting Americans. Cases of melanoma and non-melanoma skin cancer continue increasing. According to the research, the number of cancer patients increased from 3.4 million to 4.9 million. This also led to an increase in government expenditure on treating cancer. During the two periods, the total cost increased from $3.6 billion to $8.1 billion. The research generally found that cancer cases are ever-increasing. The cost is also substantially increased.
Evaluation
The resource is a peer-reviewed journal obtained from the “American Journal of Preventive Medicine. The source is reliable as it is peer-reviewed. The research has been carried by a distinguished institution, which enquires reliable sources of information. The source is also credible, as it is not credible. Credible methods are used in the collection of quantitative data, that is the survey. The source is also not older than five years, thereby providing current information, which is suitable for reference.
Source #2: Janda, M., Cust, A. E., Neale, R. E., Aitken, J. F., Baade, P. D., Green, A. C., … & Whiteman, D. C. (2020). Early detection of melanoma: a consensus report from the Australian Skin and Skin Cancer Research Centre Melanoma Screening Summit. Australian and New Zealand Journal of Public Health, 44(2), 111-115.
Summary
the peer-reviewed journal evaluated the approach used in the early detection of melanoma in Brisbane Australia. The journal also explores other strategies that can be used in addressing the health condition. The notable changes were the rise in biopsy and the ability to detect skin cancer when in situ. The source adds on the areas that need some improvements such as, the better conceptualization of molecular and clinical features of melanoma. There is a need for evaluation of the gains in cost-effectiveness and precision. The source is based on the findings from a meeting convened by the “Australian Skin and Skin Cancer Research Centre.
Evaluation
The peer-reviewed journal is suitable for responding to skin cancer through reliable research done by the Australian Skin and Skin Cancer Research Center”. The source is credible, as it is not biased. The information has been obtained from a credible source. Cancer control centers, government institutions, health specialists were engaged in the meeting. The source is reliable as it provides up-to-date information. It is also peer-reviewed, meaning that there is some consensus among the researchers.
Source #:3: Anderson, T. (2017). Restricting the use of sunbeds to prevent skin cancer. World Health Organization. Bulletin of the World Health Organization, 95(12), 798-799. DOI:10.2471/BLT.17.021217
Summary
Tanned skin has classified as a significant cause of skin cancer. The affected population includes young individuals, more so women. The tanned skin has been associated with celebrities. To get a dark color, these individuals use the tanning bed. This has led to significant changes in different states. For instance, the use of tanning beds is banned in Victoria state to an individual under 18 years. The Australian states have bolstered the measures by banning the use of sunbeds. These measures aim at reducing cases of skin cancer.
Evaluation
The source, which is a peer-reviewed journal, provides some causes of skin cancer and different measures used to prevent it in Australia states and Victoria. The information from the source is reliable. It was obtained from reputable institutions such as the WHO and the Cancer Council Victoria. The data is credible as it is up-to-date and peer-reviewed. Different health entities corroborated and came up with the conclusion that has been adopted in many states.