The most distinctive
characteristics of qualitative research include using small sample groups and
often utilizing interviews as a design mechanism. Although qualitative research
is often undermined due to its lack of statistical data, the articles, Listening
to Older Adults’ Values and Preferences for Type 2 Diabetes Care: A Qualitative
Study and A Qualitative Study of Perceived Responsibility and Self-Blame
in Type 2 Diabetes: Reflections of Physicians and Patients provide proof of
the method’s feasibility. The articles focus on the emotional needs and impacts
of diabetes type 2 on older patients and physicians.
One of the key roles
of qualitative research is to undertake an in-depth analysis of the
participants’ opinions, prejudices, beliefs, and perspectives on the research
issue. The Beverly et al. (2012) article focuses on the emotional state of both
patients and physicians after failing to actualize a treatment plan. The
article’s use of semi-structured interviews ensures that it contains an extensive
understanding of the emotional state of both parties. The informal nature of
qualitative surveys also encourages openness, thus improving the quality of the
study. For instance, physicians may deny having experienced distress or
feelings of self-blame due to a patient’s deteriorating health in stiff and
formal interviews. Face-to-face interviews or phone calls also gives
participants enough time to expand on their answers.
Qualitative research
also plays a significant role in providing evidence-based results. For example,
the Beverly et al. (2014) article shows that older populations suffering from
diabetes prefer transparency in their patient-physician relations. Participants
with high levels of communication with physicians reported to have effective self-management
routines. Although the study only used 25 older adults, it received extensive
and evidence-based results on methods of improving diabetes management. In
general, qualitative research on individual responses to medical conditions
helps physicians in creating better management and treatment methods (Woodsong
et al., 2011).