Question 1
The popularity of the statement, ‘what is right for you may not be right for me’ cannot be undermined. The statement is an illustration of the subjectivism aspect of an ethical approach. It is worth noting that different people have different views, specific ideas, and individual behaviors. The personal beliefs of the individuals model the behaviors. Burnor and Railey denote that a subjective moral model ignores the culture’s views and what is universally accepted by many individuals. Also, subjectivism is majorly reliant on the fact that our mental activity and thinking is the ultimate determinant of the rightness or soundness of ideas or actions. An example of a subjectivism approach could be that one believes that the amount of time taken during sleep affects how their day will run. One considers such a statement while they know that it may not hold for everyone. Another critical aspect of the subjectivism approach is situational analysis. In the situational analysis, one may act in a certain way to defend themselves from a given phenomenon. While lying is unacceptable, one is subjected to lie if the lie would save their lives. Therefore, subjectivism is acceptable as different views differ depending on what they find right and the situation they face.
Question 2
The acceptance of guy marriages does not necessarily imply a change in morality. Gay marriages can be said to have been accepted due to the change in beliefs and culture. What sounded abnormal in original opinions has changed. Relativism is based on the norms of a given culture that an individual subscribes to. The argument from tolerance depicts relativism as non-judgmental of the culture of a given community. The non-judgmental aspect implies the possibility of the existence of a change in morality due to gay marriages. It is worth noting the universal acceptance of gay marriages is still under question, although the relativism aspect gives a different view. Objectivism and relativism about gay marriages are quite distinct, although the difference cannot be distinguished. The societies that have accepted gay marriages may have done so due to increased global acceptance of gay marriages. Personal beliefs also enhance how people view certain aspects, such as guy marriages. Importantly, relativism is critical in how gay marriages have been perceived over the past decades.