Health Care Reforms
Name
Institution of Affiliation
Professor
Date
Health Care Reforms
Healthcare reforms’ ultimate goals are to increase insurance and contribute to affordable quality care to all netizens. It brings Access to comprehensive and quality health care services while promoting and maintaining quality health, helps prevent and manage diseases, and minimize unnecessary disabilities and premature death while working towards achieving health equity for all people (Jensen & Petersen, 2017).
Affordable care Act is the most critical health care legislation enacted in the US since the implementation of Medicare and Medicaid back in the 1960s. The law states a need for comprehensive reforms to improve the accessibility, affordability, and quality of health care.
Its main agenda was to review the factors influencing the decisions to pursue health care reforms, which brought some recommendations to improve the health care system and identify the general lessons for public policy from the affordable care act (Manchikanti et al., 2017). Health care affects the economy, both positive and adverse effects; it touches the economy, the federal budget, and the family’s financial wellbeing as a whole. It made it possible to implement health insurance, which enables children to excel at school. It also played a significant role in product maximization by adults who work to contribute to the economy.
History of Policy Issues
Research shows that at the start of the 20th century, many industrial American people missed work due to illness, which made them lose their wages. According to Benatar et al. (2018), this loss of income, which was brought about by sickness, played a significant role in contributing to poverty. These factors led to the proposal of progressive reforms implementation, which made health care insurance compulsory to protect workers against wage loss and medical cost when sickness strikes. According to several states’ research, some proposals aimed at modeling already existing programs, especially in Germany and England, were debated throughout the country and introduced as legislation in several states. This is according to research by (Jacobs & Mettler, 2020). The American Association for Labor Legislation’s (AALL). This group of educational reforms drafted some of their proposals without considering any contribution from its netizens, which created a conflict of interest between the reform leaders and popular movements. During this challenging situation, healthcare leaders lost the opportunity to rally or organize a broad-based movement. This loss forced the labor leaders and policymakers to make several changes within the system without again involving union members. According to Historian Alan Derickson, the leaders’ failure to include the association members was a crucial fail in the campaign for health security.
Healthcare reforms implementation has been a long road coming; the journey has created gaps between health care reforms and potential constituencies. This gap birthed some significant impediments to the popular mobilization on universal health care (Jensen & Petersen, 2017). However, there’s a story to be told if well-known campaigns for national health coverage d as a yardstick or the grassroots activism and socialmare brought to an end.
Many grassroots movement though has contributed to universal health care which has had several connections with constituencies. The gap between the elite and grassroots health campaign, as t showed by reform leaders, includes Lack of knowledge and interest in, also outright disqualification of widespread reforms constituencies and the strategies organized at the grassroots. However, much of the explanation also lies with the nature of the social movements themselves. For activists, they have placed some demands as more urgent or immediate or even a matter of life and death other than recognizing them as a long term change which will be a significant boost to the healthcare system. They have made it politically attainable than more comprehensive change to have a right to organize for labor movements and reproductive rights for the women movements or even research for diseases and drug access for AIDS advocacy (Gottschalk, 2018).
The argument on Policy Issues
Policy analysis is an established discipline in the industrialized world, though its contribution to developing countries is limited. The health sector majorly appears to have been abandoned. It comes as a shocker because there is a well-recognized crisis in the health system with transparent prescriptions of how the health care policy reforms in the countries’ should be presented (Khalajinia & Gaeeni, 2018).
However, there has been minimal attention given on how the countries should rule out reforms, or much less likely to favor or resist such policies. This research argues that health policy directs its attention to reform content and neglects the one involved in making policy reforms. Focus on policy content diverts attention from understanding the process, which explains why the desired policy outcomes failed and indicates how the shift between consensus and health policy conflict was established and calls for some emphases on analyzing the policy and investigation.
On the other hand, Lack of political will has been an obstacle in incorporating patient-reported and electronic health records. Putting in action some standardized practical behavioral and psychosocial items that include collecting data captured for electronic health records can improve care and human health while minimizing suffering. It can also enhance patient-provider relationships and contribute to developing better information, which will address significant medical problems care and population health management (Klein, 2019). Health systems are said to be relational, which makes many critical challenges relational and behavioral at the same time.
The Ultimate agendas that underlie the traditional health policy analysis offer minimal and partial insights into human behavior and relationship. Therefore, the health sector has a lot to learn from the broader literature on behavior and its factors. A central feature of recent debates is trust and its role in facilitating collective action, cooperation among people to achieve common goals.
Recommendation on Government Policy in21st Century
Change is inevitable; that being the case, it’s usually tricky, especially in the face of hyper-partisanship. However, in the 21st century, there is a need to embrace the affordable care act since its implementation to enable more people to have access to health care and health insurance and some assistance on how it pays. The main aim was to provide a level playing field for all people to purchase the Insurance (Khalajinia & Gaeeni, 2018). This aim made the ACA make some tough calls, which required Insurance for everyone so that the young and healthy payments would play a part in subsidizing the needs of the sick people whose ranks in the insurance pools were likely to grow.
In supplement, the government has been deeply involved in the organization for decades in financing and delivering health care services. This involvement was taken for granted; this is unfortunate considering the foundation and extent of government involvement predicated on specific vital ethical issues (Gottschalk, 2018). Protection of life, which is the principal policy in the reforms, has made equitable Access to the essential and necessary health services a fundamental right of every citizen. To increase responsibility, the health services have gone beyond the necessary basic ones that are considered a privilege, according to Jensen and Petersen (2017), which falls under the categories of needs. The following measures were put in place for affordable health care.
Health Insurance
As we know, Insurance is a component of social security and social justice. Its provided by the state, community, private for-profits entities, or a combination of them all. Its primary purpose is psychological and financial. It’s a financing mechanism for health care, which ensures that health care is available at all times and affordable to the persons seeking the services (Manchikanti et al., 2017). The government has been involved majorly in health care, which brought a dilemma on whether the city has a right to get health care from the state, or whether the state should provide healthcare at its discretion or as a privilege that made various health insurance schemes. The federal government allowed the state to offer selective health insurance coverage using specific criteria like poverty or vulnerability of children, elderly, and women.
In embracing health care insurance, we see that it will contribute to the country’s following benefits.
Access
As the research has indicated Health insurance, enrolment contributes to the protection of life by increasing overall Access to health care (Klein, 2019). More studies have shown that Insurance has enabled Access to preventive services and detects it early while treating central and chronic sickness.
Type of care
Health care can be divided into various sections, i.e., preventive vs. curative, emergency vs. continuing, and inpatient vs. outpatient. Health insurance brings a balance in all this in the protection of life. Insurance brings an assurance in the continuation of care after an emergency. According to Jacobs and Mettler (2020), however, untreated complications following an emergency episode get the patient back to the hospital.
Quality Of Life
We see that the type of service provided under different insurance types impacts the quality of services that, in return, affects the fulfillment of protecting life. The issues between the insured and uninsured bring this about. It also arises among groups among insured who do not have the same accessAccess to quality care.
Health insurance, in all its forms, is double-edged (Şimşek, 2020). Since it increases access for more people to health services overall, which is positive equity but, on the other hand, contributes to differences in the quality of care depending on socioeconomic status, which leads to negative equity. The educated and higher socioeconomic can access higher quality services either because of paying for more Insurance or using available services.
Utilization of Services
The enrollment of health insurance has directly impacted service utilization and the widening of HealthCare coverage. Research indicates that if the financial barrier of an out of pocket expenses is removed, it should theoretically lead to overutilization of services, which is understandable because it may lead to a healthy person seeking diagnostic services at the slightest suspicion of disease due to anxiety (Gottschalk, 2018) since there is such documentation in the literature reviewed of excessive services utilization because of insurance enrolment. In conclusion, the knowledge that we can derive from this survey is that health insurance majorly helps to fulfill the purpose of protecting life by increasing Access to health services; however, it does not and may not assure equity. Perfect equity will require social reforms beyond health and Insurance.
Recommendations
Efficiency and effectiveness of insurance reform need well-thought and well-implemented policies of Insurance which alternatively leads to the adoption of some of the free market tools in the two forms of Insurance, which includes the Islamic Law and universal Insurance that is sponsored by government revenues, and cooperative Insurance which is purely based on community contributions which have no profit motive. The main aim that should be achieved should be to deliver insurance products that address the jurists’ objections.
References
Benatar, S. R., Sanders, D., & Gill, S. (2018). The global politics of health care reform. In The Oxford Handbook of Global Health Politics.
Callaghan, T. H., & Jacobs, L. R. (2017). The future of health care reform: What is driving enrollment?. Journal of health politics, policy and law, 42(2), 215-246.
Gottschalk, M. (2018). The shadow welfare state: Labor, business, and the politics of health care in the United States. Cornell University Press.
Jacobs, L. R., & Mettler, S. (2020). What Health Reform Tells Us about American Politics. Journal of Health Politics, Policy and Law.
Jensen, C., & Petersen, M. B. (2017). The deservingness heuristic and the politics of health care. American Journal of Political Science, 61(1), 68-83.
Jensen, C., & Petersen, M. B. (2017). The deservingness heuristic and the politics of health care. American Journal of Political Science, 61(1), 68-83.
Khalajinia, Z., & Gaeeni, M. (2018). Challenges in Implementation of Health Care Reform in the Area of Treatment Qom City. Management Strategies in Health System, 3(3), 212-224.
Klein, R. (2019). Health Economics, Policy and Law: Remaking Policy: Scale, Pace and Political Strategy in Health Care Reform. Health Economics, Policy and Law, 14(3), 421-424.
Manchikanti, L., Helm, I. S., Benyamin, R. M., & Hirsch, J. A. (2017). Evolution of US Health Care Reform. Pain physician, 20(3), 107.
Şimşek, İ. (2020). The Politics of Healthcare Reform in Turkey. Insight Turkey, 22(3), 282-284