Article Comparison Order 907561
Introduction
The first article, “Reframing climate change as a story of human evolutionary success,” authored by Adam Frank in 2019, was written to elicit the climatic conditions change as an issue brought about by human evolution. The second article, “The impact of place and legacy framing on climate action: A lifespan approach” authored by Robert H. Wicker, sham and published in 2020, discusses the effects of the actions that have had to be taken against climatic change based on the living conditions of man. The first article was written by Adam Frank to ensure that people knew what caused climate change worldwide. The audience of the information that was put forward was the public domain. The article had great success as it reached many people through the Washington Post. The second article, authored by Robert, had the main purpose of ensuring that people have to change the story about climatic changes. The audience of the article was the general public. The article did not succeed because it is a journal that had to reach only a few people.
The climatic changes have been politicized, and the solutions will not see the light of another day, as claimed by Adam. The author claims that more scientific research has been done based on climate change, but not many people are concerned about the effects. The author claims that the issue has been about democrats and Republicans or capitalism and socialism. The claim made by the author is very true as the people in the world do not care anymore about climatic changes. The claim is true as the people who are made to research will have to find new solutions to stop climatic changes in the world.
The second article by Robert claims that the climatic changes are real, causing many effects on both humans and the environment. He gives evidence of older adults who do not care about climatic changes, putting the young generation into more danger (p. 2 of 17). The claims that are made by the author are true because of the behaviors that have been shown by the older generation who have refused to do induction to the young population (p. 3 of 17). The issue remains to be a true event because of the envisaged neglect the young generation they have for the climatic changes.
Conclusion
In conclusion, both articles give a true definition of the time people are going through as they neglect the climate changes. As claimed by Adam, the first article will need to take great care of the politicization of the climatic issue. In contrast, the second article will educate older adults to induct the young generation about climatic changes. As shown in the first article, the topic will need a revisit, and when not done, people will face the wrath of climatic changes in the future. The second article is also true as the topic encourages generational induction about climatic changes. Without such, people will suffer more in the future because of the changes in climatic conditions.