Bureaucratic Leadership
Bureaucratic leadership is a structure of administration and decision-making principles centered on defined official roles within a hierarchy of authority. This leadership style is beneficial in heavily controlled industry lines and can be an effective management style in industries that need little imagination or staff ingenuity.
Bureaucratic leaders strictly abide by the rules and guarantee their individuals obey precise procedures a good management style for severe potential hazards (for example, working with machinery, toxic substances, hazardous altitudes) or large sums of money. Bureaucratic leadership also helps manage daily activities for staff in teams and organizations that rely on flexibility, creative thinking, or innovative thinking that is far less efficient.
Charismatic Leadership
Charismatic leadership is how individual action in others is promoted through eloquent communication, persuasion, and personality power. Charismatic figures inspire fans to change something or to change how those tasks are accomplished.
A charismatic style of leadership emulates metamorphosis: both leadership styles inspire and motivate their staff members.
The difference lies in its intention. Transformative leaders are willing to reshape their relationships with stakeholders, while leaders often focus on themselves and their ambitions on charisma and may not want to change anything.
Charismatic leaders may think they can’t make mistakes, even if others warn them more about the trajectory they are heading towards.
Charismatic leaders may think they can’t make mistakes, even if others warn them more about the trajectory they are heading towards.
Servant Leadership
Servant leadership is a concept and a collection of approaches that enrich people’s lives, construct stronger institutions, and eventually establish a more equitable and compassionate planet.
Often these people lead by example. They are highly integral and generous. They can create a positive corporate culture and lead to high mortality between team members.
Supporters of transformational leadership recommend that it is a brilliant way forward in a world where values are increasingly important and that servant leaders can achieve power due to their values, ideals, and ethics.
Others, though, believe that people who practice servant leadership can “left behind other leaders, especially in competitive environments. This kind of leadership also takes time to apply properly: it is not suitable for situations where quick decisions are taken or time constraints have had to be met.
Transactional Leadership
Transactional leadership is contrasted to transition leadership more commonly. Transactional management focuses on self-motivated individuals who operate together in an organized, controlled environment. On the other hand, transformative leadership aims to empower and encourage individuals and not guide others. This leadership style begins with the idea that team members agree to obey the leader when they accept a job. The “transaction usually involves the organization, which pays the entire team for their effort and short-term compliance. The leader is entitled to “punish” team members if his work does not meet a suitable standard.
Transactional leadership is present in many situations of business management and offers some advantages. It clarifies, for example, the roles and responsibilities of all. And because transactional leadership judges performance colleagues, people who are ambitious or driven by extrinsic incentives, such as compensation, often flourish. The downside of this style is that it can be cold and amoral on its own and can lead to increased employee turnover. It also has serious limitations on artistic or experience and understanding of work. Members of the team can, therefore, often do little to improve the sense of fulfillment.