Response to Peer
The student has failed to tackle the legislative actions; instead, he has addressed what they think should be considered during the recruitment process. , talking about money as a determinant of how many candidates can get recruited is a vague assumption. The money comes as the collection cost of training the officers.
Only a single way of improving recruitment has been stated, networking, advertising, and getting to know the public.
The remaining part talks of why people come out for the recruitment process, but this has been stated from a negative perspective. It’s true that after sometimes those who graduate leave the service for better jobs.
I agree that the Paramilitary model is equivalent to boot military; those who undergo this model come out as warriors. Both models got the physical fitness training, but the student has not told us the similarities in their statement. The student has not exhausted all the open differences between the two models. Talking about combining the two models was unnecessary.
Response to Peer2
the legislative actions are stated, but question need a discussion of some legislative actions.
The student has not addressed the question that was asked, and the question needs the ways of improving the recruitment process. The stories we have been provided does not hold for departments like law enforcement, in as much as there is retirement, resignation, and death. Linking up with high schools and college is the right way.
The question has been tackled well with a great explanation of the individual models. I agree that the paramilitary is majorly focused on instilling discipline and making a correct decision under stress. The academic model approach is also well stated. It impacts professional skills to the recruits besides fitness. Indeed, there is also the learning of combat tactics and gun handling. It indeed brings the same and needed goals.