Barrick Australia- Pacific is a company in the mining industry in Australia. The company was planning to extend its operations and consider the construction of a warehouse from the case study. Initially, the mining company relied on external services or contractors to the maintenance of equipment, store, and track spare parts. Later, this organization decides to tale the sole responsibility, but this incurs additional commitments that require a proper plan. For successive integration of the new project in the company, stakeholders must come together and decide on critical issues that will be affected by the recent change. Also, proper communication must be held through the right approach for the project to work. The purpose of this paper is to provide an analysis of stakeholders from the case study presented.
Stakeholder Groups
Typically, there are vital stakeholders in Barrick Australia- Pacific company who will be affected and help facilitate the implementation of the new equipment maintenance plan. They include executive sponsors, leaders from mining, mobile maintenance, environment, supple, and health departments. The key stakeholders are brought together to discuss potential benefits, help review the new plan, and identify any threats and risks of areas of priority. Each member would be impacted differently by the new changes, and thus, coming together is a better way to see the project has attained intended benefits to everyone.
Profile Information on Stakeholders
Leaders in environmental, health, and services departments will be given a high priority due to support needed on potential risks associated with the project. The company will be implementing a new warehouse whose operation involves access to equipment, and hence the health of individuals is paramount. Leaders in supply departments fall into class A when using a matrix of stakeholder influence against stakeholder importance. Leaders from mining and mobile maintenance fall under category C because they have negligible importance and some level of influence. Executive sponsors can be profiled in category C due to their significant influence and negligible importance in the project.
Stakeholders’ Mission
Executive sponsors in a project have a mission to ensure project goals align with the company’s overall strategy. Such stakeholders do that by gathering support, communicating objectives, and overcoming resistance from organizational seniors. While a project manager can be traditionally focused on daily execution, executive sponsors typically have many responsibilities and focus on how to creates conditions for success. Leaders from mining departments are in charge of ensuring all necessary equipment is in good shape for work. Mobile maintenance must ensure tools of work have been serviced and make suggestions where necessary. The project will be executed on an organizational space that environmental department leaders have to ensure that it is done without people’s potential risk. Health ad service stakeholders work hand in hand to ensure the safety of everyone.
Stakeholder Strengths and Weaknesses
The greatest strengths of the stakeholder group in Barrick Australia-Pacific include supporting the decision-making process; help set the company’s vision and strategy of the project. From the case study, the meeting with individuals before implementing the plan has brought some concerns that prompted the project leader to question assumptions form the initial plan. When team members come together, issues are analyzed based on aired opinions, and sound decisions can be reached. Some weaknesses of project management stakeholders are limitations on time, such that sometimes high priorities may not be put on them. Another weakness is a conflict of interest due to varying viewpoints, and this might impact the process of decision making.
Stakeholder Strategy
A stakeholder strategy that Barrick Australia-Pacific will implement has to include the following steps. First- the way to involve people in crucial decisions, second-how to meet expectations, third- ways to create buy-ins, fourth- how to use the influence of stakeholders, and lastly, the best methods to communicate. Also, the strategy will incorporate ways to neutralize or avoid the negative impacts of stakeholders.
Predicted stakeholder Behavior
Stakeholder behavior in the company can be predicted by taking some factors into consideration, including power, attitude, interests, support, or influence. Stakeholders with much power; for instance, executives will affect the project portfolio. For example, project documents will be prepared for executives in the design of their preference. Some people may have negative attitudes towards the program and fails to contribute to ideas. Often, support is mixed with attitude but can as well be seen through taking actions. In the case study, Mr. Brown push project communication to some people via emails, and that means, failure to do so, stakeholders may not collaborate effectively.
Potential Conflicts and Plan to Manage
Some conflicts might arise during project implementation and integration of various stakeholders in the Barrick Australia-Pacific company. For example, there might be conflicts over project priorities, disputes over schedule, and personal conflicts. Sometimes disagreement may occur over interpersonal issues, and this can be handled through withdrawal. Conflict over timing can take place and scheduling of projects as related to tasks. The best approach towards that would be integrating a win-win or collaboration approach. Multiple viewpoints must be exhausted from different perspectives, and open dialogues will lead to consensus. Views over the sequence of project activities or tasks might differ, and this can be solved by force, direct or my-way approach.