Analysis of a Labor Law Case on Strike Contingency Plans
An employer will opt to strike a deal with the Union for the employees as a security measure to avoid a cut off in workflow whenever disputes erupt. The first step that the Employer does is identifying the probable complaints that may arise from the employees in the event of the work. The Employer goes ahead to come up with the measures that can be used to curb the challenges. It will be vital for them to identify a reliable legal organization that will help them perform a strike contingency planning with the Union.
In the scenario, the Employer appoints the coordinators and informs the concerned parties of the activities that they are undertaking. They ought to determine the number of the employees available in the workplace and the manner in which they may be replace them in case there are disputes along the way. They should also determine the method they will convince the strikers in case there is a dispute, Employer should also identify a qualified legal organization to oversee the deal. (Better, 1993). The Union should also choose a committee to present the complaint. They need to have a headquarter that they meet for discussions. The dispute needs to be appropriately done by informing the Employer and the public sector in advance. The organization should be neutral in striking of the deal
Signing a contingency plan with employees under the help of a recognized legal entity will help the Employer solve the disputes with the employees with the still attending to the work schedule. The planning will prevent them from attracting losses in the workplace as the Employer will fundamentally solve the challenges with the employees. All the three parties: the Employer, the Union, and the public sector organization, must sign the agreement letter together for transparency.
Reference
Better, M. B. (1993). Contract bargaining handbook for local union leaders. BNA Books.