application of atomic energy in war
Recent arguments latter after the application of atomic energy in war, do not align with the United States intentions. In fact, Pope Francis does not agree with the action that took regarding the bombing. Hence, he believes that the United States only squandered money by manufacturing the atomic bomb. As a result, the majority of the victims were left in major silence as hope was broken. Of course, the latter could be termed as immoral. Hence, the implication of the bomb in the Nagasaki and Hiroshima. It would be right not to support the bombing since it indicates that the material possession and advancement in power has blinded nations. Considering that the war was between countries that are wealthy and powerful, such a gift was misused gift. The majority of countries have believed that people are brought together through sacrifices and cooperation.
However, it would be unjustifiable to conclude that war might be required to unite the same people. Of course, war has its consequences, but an atomic bomb must not have been the only solution. Notably, the effects of the bombing on the Japanese would be crucial, but it would not mean that the Americans did not suffer its consequences. Considering the immigrants in Japan from the family, the also was hit by the bomb. Of course, the latter was not as a target but collateral damage. Ideally, the American government turned its back on its citizens; perhaps, some of whom might have been patriots to their country. According to Pope Francis, each religion argues its way through peace and love. To believers, the American government had not light to claim the rights of innocent souls. Although dropping the bomb was a difficult decision to make, right or wrong vital variables needed to be contemplated. That is the lives of innocent soles that had to suffer.
Atomic energy use as well as the radiation arising from such a weapon needed to be tested. Nuclear weapons not only are their immoral but also lowers the human dignity. In fact, it is evident some of the areas still face the charges released by the bomb. The latter would indicate that not only did dropping of bomb impact at the moment but also placed the future on common homes in danger. Hence, common wellness was restricted. If the United States had contemplated such ideologies, it would be true to say that the bombing could not have happened. Besides, only the unarmed peace can be considered to be true peace. If earlier nations could identify that atomic weapons only puts daily lives at risk due to the probability of self-destruction, the United could have owned the weapon. As a result, it would translate that the dropping could not have happened.
Either way, the causalities happened and can never be undone. However, no amount of logic can justify the act. In fact, President Obama acknowledges the act to be wrong in his speech delivered at Hiroshima in Japan. The New York Times marks his words of referring to death that comes from the sky. It is a clear indication, that president Obama defends his country legally can still express the guilt in the American government. Above ten thousand were lost in the bombing including dozens if prisoners from America. I mean who the government abandoned prisoner of war to the extent of killing them itself? I would say the act is inhuman if patriotic soldiers might have to repay their features through betrayal from their government.
Although America needs to end the war, it could not have been necessarily through bombing. Evidently, the country had the haste to end the war. Considering that American was still equipped and had the manpower, one way or the other US could still have won. Presumably, if the United States did not hurry to finish the war in days, the bombing could not have been necessary. In fact, on August 6, 1945, the Russian soldiers were noted as having wished to attack Japan. The latter indicates that Japan was to be defeated despite their unwillingness to surrender. Therefore, it was just a matter of added days or months for the war to end. Hence, the United States could not have dropped the bomb. Studies suggest that the radiations impacted in Hiroshima are similar to those present in any part of the earth. Perhaps, atomic bombs require so much evaluation before being launched placed waiting for their launch. Although the radiations might wear out with time after the bomb explodes, the environmental effects still will exist. Maybe the health of individuals might not at stake for the moment, but they depend on the ecosystem. Hence, the beauty of nature seizes to exist with radiation effects. Arguably, the majority would want to justify the casualties to be normal as those that occurred in any other war. But the latter is not true and these exceed the health effects.
Being considered to be an immoral act, the bomb-dropping places the development of nuclear weapons to undefendable class. War does is between soldiers since these are experienced in battlefields. Therefore, the latter means that not any other party has to be involved in the casualties. It would even be right to prevent civilians from being hurt. In fact, it would be unfair to hurt someone who is not armed in war. Contrary, the latter, bombing in Hiroshima did not only impact on the health people. Instead, the implications were even contrary to morality as the rule of war were broken as far as the military is concerned. Sadly, the innocent civilians were harmed in through such a detonation. That is, both women and children suffered the effects of the bombing. According to () the latter (children and women) are entitled to any direct impacts in a military war. Something that the United States Government understands and could not have wished it to happen in their homeland.
Surprisingly, the majority of the people would presume to understand such intent to commit an immoral thing differently. However, it feels more of discrimination or abuse of power. The use of mass murder weapons to destroy the non-combatants, specifically children and women cannot even be debatable. Considering that the act has both political and economic effects, the behaviour is a moral question which is only based on wrong or right or rather ethics that are evil or good. Besides, the basic right of humans was eliminated through the bombing. Hence, access to human wants was a thing of the past. Despite this, no compensation could easily restore the hopes of the victims. Hence the majority had no way to avoid long life traumas.