The argument free healthcare should be available to all people. After all, if that were the case, it would benefit everyone falls under the duty ethics perspective. The postulation under this ethical theory suggests that people should follow their rules to do their duty to do what is moral, and providing free healthcare to benefit the masses is morally right.
Character education should be part of the public school system in the United States. We need to cultivate integrity in our children, and the public school system should play a role in this critical process. This form of thinking falls under the virtue ethics perspective, incorporating character education to the school system would ensure the students acquire integrity through practicing virtuous habits.
The third argument on human-sacrifice not being considered wrong in other cultures, even though our culture believes it is wrong, is a moral relativism perspective. The idea in this ethical form of thinking is the said society makes moral choices based on their unique customs and practices, which are different from our own. As such, we should accept their different moral values because there is no set of universal moral standards.
The argument about same-sex marriage is right because many people in America favor it according to the polls despite it being shunned in other countries is a moral relativism perspective. That is because values and beliefs differ in every culture, and what is right in America is not what is morally acceptable in other nations. There is no universal gauge of moral choices.
The case on government legalizing same-sex marriage being wrong because it interferes with the self-determination of individuals to be involved in other forms of relationship fall under the deontology ethical perspective. The government should follow the rules and do their duty on perpetuating the culture of procreation but should also respect the choices of people who do not want to be in such relationships.
The sixth argument on the bombing of Hiroshima and Nagasaki violating the rights of people is within virtue ethics. Morality dictates that we should not endorse killing because it is wrong to kill.
Dropping the atomic bombs on Hiroshima and Nagasaki was right because those acts ended the war faster, and thus made the world a safer place. This postulation falls under the consequentialism purview that holds the premise that an action is deemed suitable if its consequence results in the highest good for many people (Moore, Parker, Rosenstand, and Silvers 2015).
Doing a background check on Mr. Jones before he is hired is a dendrology ethical perspective. The hiring body has to do a background check on their prospective employees, and following that set guideline is the ethical practice.
He doesn’t have the right character and temperament to be a state governor. He has been involved in corruption scandals, known to be dishonest, and has problems controlling his anger. This statement constitutes the virtue ethical perspective, the person in question does not live a life of moral character, and thus they are not fit to hold office because they might not make the right choice when faced with ethical challenges.
The idea that slavery is not wrong because many societies have practiced it is a moral relativism perspective. Depending on the values of a community, the culture of slavery can be accepted based on their beliefs.