Evaluation Studies. Informed Consent First, the woman in the first case portrayed that she was not in her right state of mind when she failed to remember her previous two decisions about the feeding tube. In such a case, I would advocate for the doctors to do what is morally right: insert the feeding tube to save her health. However, in the second case, the doctors are to blame for the careless mistake of providing the woman with an organ from a high-risk person. It is the woman’s right to know who her donor was, and if she is okay with the donor, the transplant could proceed. It is both morally and illegally wrong for the doctors to risk a