Character True Nature
The play by Arthur Miller tries to explain the issue of love, leadership, and authority depicted by various characters. The participant seems to be exploring the benefits and implications of inhabiting the character completely. It is dwelling on the position of empathy in its bid to symbolize even the most vicious nature. In a similar narration, the link between leadership and character manifest directly checking on virtues and vices to occupying character onstage. It is the same cases as the way a character puts on at the costume; it is the same role played by virtues to acquire it in the future.
Miller is one of the characters put in front of him, depicted as struggling with personal challenges such as drug addiction. Following the death of Monroe, he is accused of capitalizing on her death immediately after the event. The character is formed in such a way that they create a rational theme. In the case of Miller, it focuses mainly on the human insight of self-demolition as well as violence on fellow human beings. Immediately after the death of his wife, Miller insists that one of these siblings Daniel should be isolated from family affairs since he was born with Down syndrome (Bigsby, 201). He claims that the child had been institutionalized with attempts by Morath to bring him as a toddler rendering futile. The character is used by the author to explore the collective and individual issues that explored the American Psyche. He was also able to respond to the critics by claiming that it’s just fiction, and nobody has been reported in the play.
Bigsby, Christopher. “The Crucible.” Bloom’s Modern Critical Interpretations: The Crucible (2008): 183-209.