This essay has been submitted by a student. This is not an example of the work written by professional essay writers.
Death

Convicted Murderers Should be Given a Death Penalty.

This essay is written by:

Louis PHD Verified writer

Finished papers: 5822

4.75

Proficient in:

Psychology, English, Economics, Sociology, Management, and Nursing

You can get writing help to write an essay on these topics
100% plagiarism-free

Hire This Writer

Convicted Murderers Should be Given a Death Penalty.

Confirmed alleged murder criminals are purported to a death penalty to serve as examples to future murderers. In addition to that, it is crucial to consider a more rigorous and inclusive legal code to encapsulate all with premeditated murder crime in the future. Protection of right to life should be highly effective. Guilt or innocence are subject to determination before a death punishment is imposed to murder criminals. Protection of witnesses and other evidence materials should also be highly preserved and done professionally to prevent any illegal subjection of murder criminals. An analysis of the essence of a death penalty to murder convicted criminals is critically conducted below.

Anne Schubert, the district attorney in Sacramento County, believes a death penalty will be excellent for California. Majority of murder survivors in California are not contented with the judgement made over the perpetrators as they are only subjected to a jail term. Later on, it prevails wrongly for the victimized party as the murderers are liable to a reduction in tier jail terms hence being set free. There is a possibility of the victimized family or the survivors to be engulfed with a future enmity or else succumb a similar attack. A death penalty in California is thereby perceived as a permeant remedy towards attaining confidence with their safety. A recent case of Fresno occurred after 36 years of imprisonment. After the reduction of their jail term, it ended up by releasing the imprisoned to the streets, which later went on perpetrating intensive harm to the initial victim.

For instance, in Terrorism occasions, for, example, a suicide bomber focuses o ensuring everyone within the radius of the explosive dies.  By weighing the intensity of the harm committed by a terrorist, it is crucial to ensure that they are subjected to an ultimate equal price of their actions.  A death penalty should be used to curtail any possibility of future terrorist activities further.  Experts reveal that the form of punishment imposed on a victim should help in intimidating and preventing any next precedence of a similar action of murder. Terrorists should suffer the same wrath to the one they expose to their victims. Death penalty should be designed under evaluation of the intensity of manslaughter. For instance, Terror criminals should be subjected to prior torture before a mainstream death jurisdiction.

In Colorado, a majority of the residents through an opinion poll suggests that a death penalty should not be abolished.  A scenario of a drug cartel with rape and murder accusations is used to explain why it is valid to impose capital punishment in murder criminals. Additionally, through perpetuating a single murder action, a criminal is subject to being engulfed in tranquil murder contemplation as well as real murder precedence. George Brauchler believes of a further death penalty to murder criminals to ensure more fairness and equality to murder criminals.  A scenario of a serial killer should be exposed to a crueller murder punishment. It is crucial to strike a balance of injustice to safeguard the right to life as well any possibility of life sabotage. Horror in murder crimes should be prevented by all means by putting in place firmer legal framework.

The necessity for stiffer capital punishments was earlier cited by President Trump to ensure civil protection of life.  The case that occurred in Hattiesburg, Minnesota, is among the most lethal murder crimes as two cops were murdered. President Trump focused on ensuring a more effective follow up on these criminals to prevent any possibility of future prudence of murder victimization from them. The law will prevent any possible murder possibility and safeguarding the lives of every citizen equally before the law. Taking away other people’s lives will be labelled as one of the most gullible crimes without any deterrence. As long as valid evidence which is justifiable before the law is presented to the jury responsible for the case, then a better response towards a capital punishment through the death penalty will be applicable. Otherwise, failure to comply will result in a more vulnerable society where murderers will be roaming all around the community perpetrating murder crimes affluently.

In Los Angeles, it is crucial to maintain a death penalty to the overall society to prevent any possibility of justice violation. The Murders will be in a more vulnerable condition which will predispose them towards amid victimizing of the community. Not unless the legal framework will ensure a modal society that discourages taking away life then the lives of people in the organisation will result in total subordination. It is thereby crucial to protect the community by ensuring a just and fair punishment to murder criminals. For instance, prisoners in California are accountable for murder precedence that sum up to more than 1000 cases. Sexual assault has the highest possibility of engulfing in murder crimes. Children and police officers then follow respectively based on their vulnerabilities.  A death penalty is crucial in protecting society from lethal individuals who can induce harm to social welfare and stability.

Decongestion of prisons is likely to prevail with increased reduction of murder prisoners automatically. A death penalty will ensure prisons have the necessary facilities in the prisoners effectively to prevent any possibility of treats associated with health risks and natural contamination. The prison warders are highly exposed to possible murder as the murder prisoners can gang up to attack them. Some of the Jails have a high number of murderers who are lethal to every individual, either living or working in prison. The necessary effective measures should be placed to curb further criminal conduct in prisons.

Human dignity is protected through capital punishment to ensure more solid protection from human selfishness. It is crucial to ensure that abolishing the death penalty is more lethal to the morality of the citizens. The government should set more effective means of curbing murder cases from prevailing in the society. Adequate treatment of people in the community from the predation of their lives will ensure a more safe and stable society which will enable sufficient production across the community. The defendants should be exposed toa harsh judgement that will paralyze their small moral compass. Exposure of human dignity to impunities ends up breaching the overall value for life hence inducing high murder cases in the society.

Intentional killings are likely to increase extrajudicial cases of murder in the community, and a better action should be adopted to curtail further increase in such cases. A death penalty can ensure that everyone is below the law. For instance, the security personals who take advantage of their positions should be convicted of murder to provide a more fair and just society which will prevent subordination. Some of the murder criminals are willing to continue to take lives of their victims due to various reasons, for instance, due to perceived threats such as competition which can result into further depletion of human rights protection. Furthermore, intending to kill others shows a sense of selfishness which is likely to be punished through a similar severity of their crimes. Failure to a death penalty will increase victimization of the various members of the society hence a rebuild of cartels which will predate social democracy. Validation of a death penalty will threaten everyone in the organisation from taking away the lives of their partners. Intimate partner violence has recently been a significant threat to the lives of partners living together. The risks of poverty and employment have been sidelined against the considerable problem of intimate relations, turning out as sour. Murder is likely to prevail in such instances hence exposing a couple to death threats.

Administration of adequate legal measures will ensure everyone’s life is protected from any instance of social attacks. Psychological drawbacks induced by murder experience are abolished through providing these victims feels more secure as tier threat suffer a similar experience.  Devolution of a death penalty will ensure the society members are protected from amid death threats and provide moral conduct which is allowed to the societal guidelines. Furthermore, it is crucial to ensure a public awareness campaign which will ensure a rapid sensitization on the side effects of engaging in any form of murder.

The society is subject to adequately learn better forms of social protection through using a death punishment to anyone who wishes to kill others. A public consciousness will also lower the propensity of other crimes associated with the use of force like burglary die to the far of engaging in a murder instance. The social security is thus harnessed through the adoption of the model hence ensuring a steadfast mechanism of ensuring law abidance across the society. Security breaches such as corruption cases which are linked to loss of lives will take their desired ways hence discouraging collecting of bribes to facilitate extrajudicial killings.

In the long run, it is crucial to consider a more inclusive model to caution every citizen despite their position in authority; it will ensure reduced predation or misuse of power to kill others. For instance, in military academies, a death penalty will provide straightforward compliance to the right to protect life. The basal justice is set to propel from all agencies. The vindication will make better communication of a death penalty as everyone in the society will use all means o prevent themselves from merging into murder crimes. Cod blood murders should be put in the limelight o the community to serve as examples to murderers who think they are above the law.

In conclusion, a death penalty for convicted murders is vital in protecting human dignity and protection to the right to life. Improved compliance with the respective legal codes will see the protection of everyone across society. The severity of murder is also applicable to exemplarily show the entire society o how to protect everyone in the community irrespective of any differences. A death penalty will lower murder prevalence in society.

 

 

  Remember! This is just a sample.

Save time and get your custom paper from our expert writers

 Get started in just 3 minutes
 Sit back relax and leave the writing to us
 Sources and citations are provided
 100% Plagiarism free
error: Content is protected !!
×
Hi, my name is Jenn 👋

In case you can’t find a sample example, our professional writers are ready to help you with writing your own paper. All you need to do is fill out a short form and submit an order

Check Out the Form
Need Help?
Dont be shy to ask