Democracy Evolution in the Early Republic
Democracy was so much changing in the American republic in the span of the ruling of some presidents. Among them, which one was depicting g democracy in the best and most appropriate way? This paper will fund out how presidents Jefferson and Jackson portrayed and gave out democracy in the American republic at their times. These two presidents had very contrasting minds. Sometimes they would think and similarly do their things. This identity and fact of them. There happened many electoral changes that made the and also added to the economic policy being improved. This, therefore, encouraged the rapid growth of democracy in the United States. Jackson’s leadership, which was approximately twenty years is when two parties were created. Therefore, these two parties sought to fight for the vote a common man was expected to give.
Democracy by President Jackson was regarded and taken as much better than Jefferson’s times. During the time of the ruling of Jackson, many people were given in using messages. Jackson was so much loved and known commonly by people of low classes. This president then took that popularity and used it to impose and share his mind with the people around him and far from him in a more natural way than Jefferson. Jefferson democracy was least regarded since it always tried to show that people who were expected to vote had to have some property. This was, therefore, setting out other people who were low-class people. These two men had similar beliefs and ideas that led them to speak their minds. Due to slight differences, these two presidents then had some differences in the ruling. They depicted democracy in different ways and manners (Barker et al. 12).
The differences in the democratic ruling of the two presidents were highly based on how a common man is being treated unequally. These two presidents were showing a sense of love and equality to their subjects but in different ways. Looking at President Jefferson, he mostly wanted people to be educated. He thought that people who are trained could be able to be put sense and reason with him. This made the less fortunate people seem down then looked. It made them feel as if they lacked a place in the government. The subjects who were not educated did not have a say in the government at all. Even if they gave out a piece if their thought, they did not get to the level they might have wanted to achieve (Cole and Donald 33). Therefore, another solution had to be found to cater to and accommodate these suppressed races of people. In this government, democracy was shared equally among the educated. It was not enjoyed by the people who were not educated. Taking minds back, this was a time where only a few people would manage to have an education for them. Therefore a very high percentage of people were not educated at all.
President Jackson was taken to be the most democratic president at this time. Many reasons made this president be recognized by many. This was because he was so much concerned about the people who were taken and regarded as people in the low class. Jackson had a thought that seemed very real and could work for many (Barry III 126). He thought that letting the common people vote for their leaders and in a democratic way would help fight corruption. Through this type of democracy, he realized that people would surely have too large extents, social, political, and economic equality. Like Jefferson, this president was also not perfect, but he tried his level best to serve his subjects. He also made mistakes as he tried to seek for the best way to present democracy in the American republic.
Although they contrasted some times, they also had some similarities. Both of them were seeking ways to bring equality in the government. As it is researched, they both practiced democracy, though, in different ways. Jackson would serve through the opinion and advice from the common man. This made the county-run very smoothly.
On the other hand, Jefferson ruled over his subjects according to what he thought was best. He thought of his questions in the least manner possible. This was portrayed when he would make a dictation of a decision he made regardless of how it would affect his subjects. The two presidents were very respectful of their respective subjects. Jefferson led first, and Jackson came afterward. Their leadership impacts were evident to every single question they had under them. The impact and changes that occurred after each one of the leaders were clear to everyone (Wilentz and Sean).
Different aspects caused the changes in the government in both their rulings. Each one of them is trying to show how they can present equality to their subjects. The changes they made in the democratic government was done when trying to show how best they can lead with justice. These changes were so significant in the American republic government because it made the rise of social political and economic equality. The common man was able to meet his desires by being allowed to vote for himself. This made it very much easier for everyone in society to be able to fight for their rights.
Every person being led seeks to be led by a leader concerned with the rights they hold. They seek so much to be shown care and importance. These two presidents always tried to rule in a way to show the subjects that they care about them at all costs. Many of them would even say they preferred that president for the other. This shows that each one of them has an urge to be ruled with dignity, respect, and democracy. Everyone feels that they have the freedom and should have the freedom to express their thought and be listened to. Jacksonian democracy was loved by many because it tried to understand these facts about leadership.
Works cited
Barker, Lucius Jefferson, and Ronald W. Walters, eds. Jesse Jackson’s 1984 Presidential Campaign: Challenge and Change in American Politics. University of Illinois Press, 1989.
Cole, Donald B. A Jackson Man: Amos Kendall and the Rise of American Democracy. LSU Press, 2004.
Barry III, Herbert. “Takeover: The Return of the Imperial Presidency and the Subversion of American Democracy. New York: Little, Brown, 2008. 422 pages.” The Journal of Psychohistory 40.3 (2013): 227.
Holt, Michael F. “The Rise of American Democracy: Jefferson to Lincoln.” (2006): 491-493.