Descartes ritics lodged against him on the claims about God’s existence
Following critics lodged against him on the claims about God’s existence, Descartes is faced with a dilemma on which direhttps://sharksavewriters.com/history-of-the-idea-of-race/ction to pursue. His central claim was to prove God’s existence, with facts that sound contradicting. Thus the opposers find it easy to discredit his arguments staunchly. With much doubt, the critics question his ideology and the origin of the information presented. Despite his earlier analysis of the source of his intelligence, the opponents use strong arguments to deliver the point that God never exists. Descartes is left in a dilemma on the real debate on God’s existence. In an attempt to analyze the debate, he uses these three points to convince the critics.
Descartes based his argument in the III meditation by saying that God exists through the manifestation of innate ideas such as triangles and circles. Descartes’s arguments revolve on the primary origin of his ideology of God. He relates his ideology to have been instituted by God. His point is highly objected through the use of perfect beings. The critics argue that anything excellent can happen as a result of something equal to its potential; hence there is nothing behind. The critics give an example through the idea of coldness, and there is nothing behind it in reality. The use of coldness analysis is to reinforce that there is nothing special on unique happenings; hence there is no God.
Descartes argues that his arguments are based on the ideas created and invented by God. He tries to say how God is infinite, and he views himself as finite. His point is highly objected, and the critics argue that no one has a clear and distinct conception of God as infinite. The critics base his arguments derived from his feeling of inferiority and the use of imagination over something that does not exist. The critics argue that the use of fantasies and dream images have misguided the thinking of Descartes.
Descartes thinking about the existence of God is rejected in the III meditation. The rejection is based on the ability to use ideas, which he points out that originates from him. The critics point out that his knowledge is always increasing, and this might have contributed to the origin of his omnipresence ideology. The critics dispute the ability of the knowledge to have generated from external forces. The critics further argue that increased understanding can be useful in obtaining more perfections. This argument proves that perhaps the increased knowledge of Descartes might have contributed to his understanding of omnipotence and omnibenevolence. The critics argue that everyone has three perfect potentials: while one may not be perfect, they may also have the potential to be accurate.
It is evident to conclude that God never exists based on the argument presented by the opponents. The analysis is drawn by the weak points of Descartes, who rotate on one aspect of using the origin of the ideology rather than basing the argument on facts. In addition, they argued that nature controls everything, and there is nothing like supernatural power behind any phenomenon. It is so bright that with growth and development, one can develop and increase his knowledge levels that help in the implementation of different ideologies. The fact that one experiences something powerful does not mean that it originates from God because some other parts of the body might be useful and superior to the other, but this does not make them less important than the others.