This essay has been submitted by a student. This is not an example of the work written by professional essay writers.
Artists

DETAILED REVIEW OF SHURE SM57 VS SM58 MICROPHONES

This essay is written by:

Louis PHD Verified writer

Finished papers: 5822

4.75

Proficient in:

Psychology, English, Economics, Sociology, Management, and Nursing

You can get writing help to write an essay on these topics
100% plagiarism-free

Hire This Writer

DETAILED REVIEW OF SHURE SM57 VS SM58 MICROPHONES

Overview of Shure SM57

  1. SM58

A microphone is a device

that interprets sounds that are noticeable all around into electronic signals

or transmits them to a recording device. Microphones are used together with

numerous kinds of recording gadgets for communication and music recording. Dynamic

microphones work to some degree like a speaker but in reverse, changing over

sound waves into electrical signals. Ordinarily, a dynamic microphone structure

is incredibly intense and impenetrable to moisture. However, dynamic microphone

do not need their power supplies. The Shure SM57 and SM58 share such attributes.

Both the Shure SM57 and

the SM58 are well known and the most used microphones in many places. From

studios to live presentations in many areas in the world, they are the most

used microphones. There are relatively few differences between the Shure SM57

and SM58. In general, the two receivers are very similar; in fact, they are

practically indistinguishable.

While the Shure SM57 is

designed for artists, the SM58 is custom-made mostly for recording vocals. The

even cardioid pattern allows every sound to be obtained clearly and uniformly.

Regardless of what sort of performance it is recording, be it podcasters or

studio recordings, the SM58 releases your message to the audience with that

fresh sound that makes you yearn to use it every time.

Shure SM57 vs. SM58

Circumstances They Are Well Used

The SM57 is the most

appropriate mic in a studio setup. If that is the reason that you need a mic

for, then you are in for a memorable recording experience with the SM57.

On the other hand, the

Shure SM 58 shaped frequency reaction smoothers out the sound production,

enabling a much smoother recording to an ideal sound quality. With a focus on

catching quality vocals, the SM58 additionally has a pneumatic mount.

Shure SM57 vs. SM58 Similarities

Polar Patterns

Both the Shure SM57 andSM58 are designed with a cardioid pattern. The section of the microphone’s

various angles is generally heart-shaped. For that reason, it gets the cardioid

name. However, in reality, it appears like a vertical cross-section area of an

apple, with the tail being the back of the pattern. The cardioid or the

unidirectional design is broadly used to single out sounds showing up from the

sides or end of the mic.

Shure SM57 vs. SM58

Differences

Design and Structure

Some part of what makes

the SM57 and SM58 so distinct is their exterior design. The two microphones

contain a grille. The SM58 grille is more prominent than the SM57 one and is

more likely to capture the sound details of any vocal presentation. It also

possesses a built-in pop channel to limit plosives and other undesirable sounds

from recordings.

The SM57 has a small

grille that includes a resonator and grille put together to avoid any potential

vocal blemishes that get their way through. The grille in the SM57 makes a

piece of the cartridge

Connectivity

The SM57 exclusively

works when it is connected with a wire. The SM58 can work with or without a

wire connection. Extra parts would be necessary to make this work. However, if

you are allowed to move around when making a presentation, a speech, or any

other live performance, the SM58 is the receiver you would require. There are

wireless versions of the SM58 microphones

The SM57’s increasingly fixed structure would most likely make matters difficult and upset your manner of thinking.

Shure SM57 vs. SM58

Advantages

The Shure SM57 and SM58

microphones have undergone rigorous testing. They have been run over by a tour

bus, they have been totally submerged in water. Surprisingly, they continue

working, as usual, producing quality sounds. Since condenser microphones have

such a large number of individual parts, they cannot be compared with dynamic

microphones on this level.

Another exciting factor

adding to the SM57’s life span is its resistance to dampness and high

temperatures. These natural changes ordinarily occur during transportation and

storage. The mix of these two conditions can cause undesirable noise, for

instance, crackling and popping.

It is easier to record

loud volumes since they have next to zero electronics or incorporated circuits.

They can take a great deal of weight and continue to transmit voltage. The

Shure SM57 and SM58 microphones are indestructible.

Frequency Response

Generally, a microphone

reacts to sound waves from their diaphragms, changing over the airwaves into

audio signals. Sound waves have a frequency of between 20 Hz – 20,000 Hz. The

SM57 mic has a frequency reaction of between 40 Hz to 15 kHz. That implies the

SM57 will adequately reproduce sounds in the scope of 40 Hz to 15,000 Hz. The

mic will be able to produce sounds on frequencies in its mic signal.

Whereas the Shure SM58

has a frequency range of between 50Hz to 15,000 Hz.

Sound Pressure Levels

(SPL levels)

Practically, there is no

restriction on the high steady sound levels (SPL) the SM57 can manage. In all

honesty, no sound is too powerful for it to handle. The frequency range that

may cause disturbance is around 100Hz at 150dB SPL. That is louder than the

sound of a jet engine. At 20 kHz, the SM57 can speculatively manage around

190dB SPL.

That is the reason why

dynamic microphones are so appropriate for recording things such as guitar

amps. The user can adjust the volume to be amazingly high volumes and record

all the force that an amp can deliver without worrying that the microphone

might distort the signal.

Both the Shure SM57 and

SM58 are well developed and can be relied upon to perform well daily. Since

they are both dynamic microphones, they are less susceptible to noise caused by

wind. That is due to the dense mass of the dynamic diaphragm.

Bottom line

Whether you choose an

SM57 or SM58 is your own decision. From various points of view, the two

microphones make comparably attractive offers. They’re reliable, sensible, and

produce an incredibly exceptional sound.

Regardless, their

development and design imply that your decision indeed relies upon what you

intend to do with the microphone.

 

  Remember! This is just a sample.

Save time and get your custom paper from our expert writers

 Get started in just 3 minutes
 Sit back relax and leave the writing to us
 Sources and citations are provided
 100% Plagiarism free
error: Content is protected !!
×
Hi, my name is Jenn 👋

In case you can’t find a sample example, our professional writers are ready to help you with writing your own paper. All you need to do is fill out a short form and submit an order

Check Out the Form
Need Help?
Dont be shy to ask