Exam on Criminology
Question 1
Concerning this case, the sentence passed was not unfair based on the gravity of the drug possession in numerous jurisdictions from corner to corner of the globe. In the majority of cases, such crimes are considered severe and punishable through a set minimum obligatory prison verdict to institute general prevention to possible wrongdoers within the community despite the quantity of drug caught up. This form of the sentence is common in punishing drug-associated cases.
There are some numbers of factors that should be considered in sentencing in the system of criminal justice. These factors include the nature of the committed offense; in this case, it is well-thought-out whether an offense is categorized as a crime of transgression. In many instances, the gravity of the crime is as well considered in the course of passing judgment. Several jurisdictions consider the crime of possessing drugs as a grave offense irrespective of the quantity involved. This is a conventional method, particularly in nations that have declared a fight on drugs like the United States. Countries that have declared war on drugs have put up obligatory minimum sentences that are more severe in several cases, and set up average punishment to be carried out in situations of drugs. All these activities have been performed to indicate general deterrence to citizens in association with drug consumption and possession (Easton & Piper, 2012).
Question 2
Research conducted by Justice Research and Statistics Association, the impacts of incarceration and drug rehabilitation concerning which act raises the number of individuals who get off drugs. It was discovered that 58% of individuals who received rehabilitation were arrested again within one year, whereas 76% of persons who did not receive rehabilitation were re-arrested within one year.
Incarcerating an individual for a non-violent drug-associated offense offers a temporary method for controlling the individual from doing the crime for the period they are in jail. The best alternative for incarceration as a way of reducing drug-related crime is drug rehabilitation. With the increase in crimes associated with drugs, prisons and jails have been overpopulated. If an individual commits an offense that is not violent and associated with drugs, there is an opportunity that the court may decide to take the person to rehabilitation instead of prison or jail. The legal systems also prefer to rehabilitate individuals who are addicted to alcohol instead of incarcerating them. Drug rehabilitation is a better technique of increasing getting drug off than incarceration, which only reduces the offense from happening during the period of sentence for the individual.
Question 3
Every government should concentrate on educating individuals on drug treatment, for this will result in low drug addiction. Several steps should be focused and put into consideration to assist reduce drug addiction. The government, for instance, should create awareness of educating persons on the adverse effects of drug addiction. This will help numerous young adults who are typically led to drug addiction through peer pressure. The government should also offer money to allow extensive training of guidance and counseling; the professionals will, therefore, offer advice to every person who visits them due to the inability to handle drug addiction.
As a result of much research done all over the world, drug rehabilitation assists a large number of the individual to control drug addiction as compared to prison and jail. Therefore, the government should emphasize on development of more rehabilitation centers to help large numbers of persons under drug addiction. Non-violent offenses that are related to drugs should not get jail or prison judgment; instead, they should be taken to drug rehabilitation.
Question 4
No, there should be no strict rules and regulation s in supplying and making of pharmaceutical drugs. The governmental and private firms that deal with the processing of pharmaceutical drugs should be allowed to be free from rules and regulations by the government. In my perspective, I think that applying rules and regulations on the making and supplying of pharmaceutical drugs might result in the trade-off. Especially if the laws passed do not favor the firms, there will be a limited number of organizations willing to join the pharmaceutical industry.
Placing harsh rules and regulations on the firms responsible for making and supplying pharmaceutical drugs would make the field be a less desirable industry for new upcoming potential investors. And minimum investment in pharmaceutical drugs would result in less research concerning innovative and new cures. The firms should have the freedom to encourage extensive research that will provide treatments to any infection that would come up in the future.
Works Cited
Easton, S., & Piper, C. (2012). Sentencing and punishment: The quest for justice. Oxford University Press.
https://www.treatmentsolutions.com/blog/top-5-ways-to-prevent-substance-abuse/
https://luxury.rehabs.com/alcohol-rehab/rehab-instead-of-jail/
https://www.vox.com/science-and-health/2016/11/30/12945756/prescription-drug-prices-explained