Genetic Enhancement
Rather than treatment genetic enhancements aims at improving the already adequate capacities. The normal genes are in this case targeted to give rise to the most exceptional traits. There is no clear cutline between treatment and the enhancements as in the example of vaccination to boost immunity. It is, however, identified that the attempts to improve an individual condition above the critical level should be considered an enhancement. An intervention on conditions such as delicate anemia and thalassemia are identified as treatment. Despite, the affiliated advantages at the individual level there are cases where a parent may have utilized delicate technologies to improve on either the beauty or cognitive ability of a child. Such alongside other challenges can be used as the basis for acknowledgment of genetic enhancement as a moral vice. The primarily affected aspects are fairness and equity. While equity involves the social placement the fairness entails the treatment of individuals.
Genetic enhancement raises a moral objection based on the fact that it gives an unfair advantage to some people. The aspect is based on the fact that while it is easier for some to cater for the expenses, others cannot manage. Furthermore, accepting the practice universally will defeat our lives since it interferes with the natural phenomenon. Despite the fact that the enhancements will improve the collective advantage contrary to the individual level disadvantage the affiliated social cost is huge at the individual levels. It can further be acknowledged that the diversity of personalities nurtures social respect in addition to the essence of disparity in equity. The eventual effect of genetic enhancements is the perpetuity of weaker traits that threatens autonomy.