How companies ensure an ethical operating system
Introduction
In this study assignment, the main point of discussion will be on how the companies ensure an ethical operating system based on a moral supply chain management concept, whether the ethical practices are useful to be implied based on the supply chain management program. To discuss this whole process, a literature review will be taken, considering the points highlighted by various authors and practitioners as a whole. Apart from this, a critical analysis will also be done based on the research conducted, followed by a suitable conclusion at the end.
Discussion
In the discussion part, answers to questions have been addressed.
Literature review
(Fontana, E. and Egels-Zandén,2019) have stated that in the case of meeting the supply chain based on company perspective, the importance of corporate social responsibility has an important role to play. It represents a powerful tool based on the overall labor conditions. The concept of global value chain analysis can try to influence the supplier’s collective behaviors based on the CSR engagement program. Thus in the companies of different countries, it has been seen that the suppliers are interlined with the overall CSR engagement policies and plan with a horizontal network. The CSR activities can be a good source of labor activities, and based on the networking pressure towards its collective CSR behavioral aspects, geographic isolation, and competitive differentiation and another sort of external trouble making these CSR activities can drive its supply chain valuation and encourage the process to meet organizational dynamics.
As per (Kusi-Sarpong et al.2019), in the big business houses, the concept of corporate sustainability management cannot be underestimated. The supply chain management has been useful to imply sure sustainability in the context of innovation. Often the business houses fail to promote the research procedure, and thus the lack of an in-depth research stimulus can hinder the study process for its overall innovation advancement. The sustainable innovation criteria can create a useful business framework for investigating the concept of the supply chain in the multinational companies. Thus the sustainable innovating standards can be helpful towards the decision making context. The criteria weighted in this regard can be aggrieved, averagely used for ranking. The study results highlighted by the authors show information about the industrial partners, practitioners, and decision-makers based on the supply chain management program towards sustainable development aspects. In the manufacturing sector as well, the supply chain management program has a more significant role to play in this regard.
(Saberi et al.2019) have highlighted the fact that to implement the global context of ethical practice determination, the concept of blockchain technologies based on the supply chain management concept also has an active role to play in this regard. Mostly all the global leaders are, looking to transform their business through the implementation of comprehensive Blockchain technology. As a distributed digital leader performer that ensures transparency, traceability, and security prospects can promise to keep more extensive information based on the context of global Blockchain technologies. The impact of blockchain technology based on supply chain management has been addressed. This technique can effectively be helpful for the government, community, and other consumer preferences towards meeting its sustainable goals. The potentially disruptive technology cans create disruption as well as different sorts o potential barriers, which are inter-organizational, technical, and other external obstacles. Thus it can be said that the overall supply chain management can be held fruitful from the implementation of Blockchain technologies.
According to (Koberg and Longoni 2019), there are different sorts of business controversies based on the implementation of an effective supply chain process. Currently, all the firms are struggling to get into improved environmental, social, and economic outcomes for improving the overall sustainability procedure in this regard. There are certain key business elements regarding the global chain concept. On the verge of creating proper research on this aspect, identified configurations and different sorts of government mechanisms can try to evaluate the journey of proposing a practical supply chain management concept. There are differences between focal firms and other multinational corporations’ supply chain management concepts. The process is being managed generally by third parties; hence the local firms can also try to generate a productive and abrupt usage of the idea of ethical issues in the supply chain.
(El-Kassar and Singh 2019) have stated that since most of the organizations come across different sorts of the ethical problems to adopt environmentally friendly business aspects. Thus based on environmental performance, it can be said that green innovation, green technology as well as individual usage of green product innovation can try to determine the needs and try to overcome the sustainable challenges. Thus to understand the critical context regarding ethical practices, all these drivers can try to create a sufficient space to deal with such complex business frameworks. Hence this competitive advantage can try to overcome all the significant business aspects to meet the management practices as well as H.R. practices. Thus, for this reason, all the Middle East regional countries or gulf countries do face ethical issues regarding the context of the supply chain management program.
As per (Hastig and Sodhi 2020) have showcased the utilization of operations management process in the context of supply chain management. For example, in the pharmaceutical industry, there are different sorts of needs related to the aspect of business requirements that can look to create certain critical factors of sustainability. The primary business requirements for implementing Blockchain technologies can persist in its consumer valuation, the central business requirements in the case of increasing the overall operational efficiency. For example, aspects like improved corporate sustainability, capabilities, and collaborative capacities, supply chain practices, leadership operations, and business ethics, as well as governance of traceability efforts, can also look to generate a more comprehensive and fair way of distributing the significant business aspects for this empirical work process. On the other hand, in the case of ethical practices, it can be noted that that almost all the effective business practices can try to immensely create a compelling valuation for determining the process of the supply chain in companies in this regard.
(Plant et al.2019) have stated that the concept of sustainability induced towards ethical considerations of production and order procurement can try to mitigate the demand procedure based on ethical considerations. By drawing the impact model to understand the severity of deception, implementation of the socially sustainable method as well as its primary business impacts by examinations in the case. For example, in the case of the Australian souvenir industry, it is found that the firm can also try to decouple the overall business practices as a whole. The concept of deception can also try to motivate customers ethically. Furthermore, the indigenous people can try to develop the supply chain management concept in the business procurement to infringe the idea of human rights in this regard as a cultural modulation.
(Hu et al 2019) have stated that the shared notional economy has been introduced in many sectors, and it has been provided in different benefits to consumers and asset owners. Despite another sort of remarkable improvement based on the aspect of a shared economic concept. The overall supply chain management, in its broad perspective, showed to the global investment recovery practices as well as the shared corporative social responsibilities in this regard. For example, in case of green management practices have created a specific qualitative study with its further participant based on the survey techniques as a whole, the concept of sustainability practices based on shared economics procedure can try to create a significant business platform for the organizations in this regard for its long term sustainable marketplace.
(Ghadge et al.2019) the aspect of sustainable procurement is steering today’s sustainable supply chain management in its reasonable business practices. The business procedure can try to trend the lasting performance of the overall large enterprises for the aspect of the supplier selection procedure as well as the geographical locations as a whole. The sizeable global enterprise can try to discuss the sustainable procurement practices that have been analyzed, and it’s multiple hierarchical decision-makers. The overall dynamics capabilities view and its stakeholder theory are utilized to develop a significant business hypothesis in this regard. As per different sorts of results, the overall sustainable procurement performance for the large enterprises varies across primary supply chain tiers and increases the whole directions from the endpoint of the customers. Thus from the standardization prospect, the overall regulation activities, as well as the dynamic capabilities of global and large enterprises, can be effectively observed to meet the geographical regions.
Critical evaluation
From the overall manufacturing procedure, it can be said that currently, the companies can try to meet the increasingly complex challenges. From the literature review, it is to be noted that the economic instability can work to effectively compliance pressure and heightened global competition (Seuring et al.2019). Thus most recently, the process is maintained under its observation to which the organization can try to source, manufacture, and to meet the distributed goods. Hence from the survey results, it can be said that most of the customers can try to match the significant products to design to be reduced and recycled technique. Hence the suitable and sustainable practices can be useful in this regard. Thus from the responsive shifting procedure, the number of steps can try to charge the way in its operating techniques. There are more sustainable ways of working and even expanding focus on deploying corporate social responsibility initiatives in which these are shining the spotlight primarily on their ethical sourcing techniques. On the other hand, there are many types of industry sectors; there are significant technologies that have a vital role in developing more ethical transparency of information supply (Khalid and Seuring 2019). Thus through the implementation of different systems, the above information based on the concept of supply chain management. Furthermore, various steps have been successfully building ethical and sustainability issues in this regard. Hence these are as follows-
Trustworthy suppliers
From the author’s point of view, it can be said that before embarking on the ethical supply chain strategy, the organization needs to locate the trading partners who share the same ethical practices. There are different sorts of ethical practices; there are significant potential partners based on the specific database (Ghadge et al.2019). For example, the business in question maintains sustainable working practices, that can use conflict-free minerals in the product procedure based on labor practices. There are necessary procedures the trustable partners with whom the worker can work with. Hence it can be said that the ethical working practice across the significant supply chain management aspect (Fellows and Liu 2020).
Trading partner relation
Once a supplier has been selected, it can be said that the ethical issues have been essential to secure the supplier interaction with the organization. The process can try to increase trust and minimize the significant risks across the overall trading partnering relationship. It can be said that the process of identity and access management platform for assigning a digital identity tom trading partners across the whole business ecosystem (Nayak et al.2019). Other than that the process can ensure the external suppliers and its business partners and the contractors have secure access to the internal systems which is needed to meet the ecosystem, logistics, warehouse management as well a the inventory management can try to develop the overall business database in this regard (Yeoman, and Santos 2019).
Digitalization in supply chain
Thus the ethical changes in its desired trading procedure, companies can try to connect the electronically meet the business operations. Therefore to meet the digital supply chain management as a whole. The cloud-based data integration environment can also allow the overall market conditions. The embraced digital supply chain also helps to prevent the fascination of the manual and paper-based supply chain documents, and it can be indirectly reducing the number of counterfeit parts entering the supply chain based on the aftermarket sector as a whole (Panigrahi et al.2019).
Monitor shipment province
Hence to build trust and to protect the reputation of an organization knows the source of all the parts that can make up the products. Thus from the internet is things process can try to meet the organization’s valuation towards its supply chain visibility process as a whole—the improvement techniques based on delivery of shipment. The internet of things can try to measure the temperature of frozen or perishable goods (Yeoman and Santos 2019). The shock levels have been fragile goods. The primary location techniques via the overall positing methods can be damaged in this regard. Based on the organizational valuation, there have been several steps that have been changed to meet the operating procedure (Fernie and Grant 2019). The embraced greener, most sustainable ways of working and majorly focusing on the overall social media initiatives for meeting the spotlights, especially on meeting the ethical sourcing techniques as a whole. Different industry sectors, as well as its technologies, can try to develop a social and moral responsibility technique for achieving the transparency of information based on the supplier’s ideas as a whole. Some systems can try to capture, and the primary business information found on the supply chain procedure. Thus these supply chain procedures can try to overcome the organizational supply chain valuation (Meredith and Shafer 2019).
Trustworthy supply chain procedure
Before embarking on the overall supply chain procedure, the business organizations need to locate the potential partnership procedure based on the business areas. For example, in Australian organizations, working practices can try to meet the conflicting practice in this regard. On the other hand, there are different sorts of labor practices; it can be said that the process tends to be imperative that companies can be able to trust the primary business problems on which they can work with. Hence to ensure that all the fundamental ethical practices across the end to end supply chain procedure (Hughes et al.2019).
Conclusion
From the overall report, it can be concluded that based on the expectation that the companies can try to ensure specific operating procedures regarding the supply chain procedure. There is a particular ethical consideration that has been meeting the different business practices in this regard. From mixed literature reviews based on the operations perspectives, mostly all the authors have described that there are concepts like Blockchain technologies, multinational organizations’ values, and policies that have also looked to identify the significant procedural changes in this regard. Apart from this, the critical discussions regarding this aspect have effectively tried to meet the significant organizational business procedure in this regard.
References
El-Kassar, A.N., and Singh, S.K., 2019. Green innovation and organizational performance: the influence of big data and the moderating role of management commitment and H.R. practices. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 144, pp.483-498.
Fellows, R., and Liu, A., 2020. Culture in supply chains. Successful Construction Supply Chain Management: Concepts and Case Studies, pp.167-209.
Fernie, J., and Grant, D.B., 2019. Fashion Logistics: Insights into the fashion retail supply chain. Kogan Page Publishers.chain. Journal of cleaner production, 225, pp.291-303.
Fontana, E., and Engels-Zandén, N., 2019. Non-Sibi, sed omnibus: influence of supplier collective behavior on corporate social responsibility in the Bangladeshi apparel supply chain. Journal of Business Ethics, 159(4), pp.1047-1064.
Ghadge, A., Kidd, E., Bhattacharjee, A., and Tiwari, M.K., 2019. Sustainable procurement performance of large enterprises across supply chain tiers and geographic regions. International Journal of Production Research, 57(3), pp.764-778.
Hastig, G.M., and Sodhi, M.S., 2020. Blockchain for supply chain traceability: Business requirements and critical success factors. Production and Operations Management, 29(4), pp.935-954.
Hu, J., Liu, Y.L., Yuen, T.W.W., Lim, M.K., and Hu, J., 2019. Do green practices really attract customers? The sharing economy from the sustainable supply chain management perspective. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 149, pp.177-187.
Hughes, A., Morrison, E., and Ruwanpura, K.N., 2019. Public sector procurement and ethical trade: governance and social responsibility in some hidden global supply chains. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers, 44(2), pp.242-255.
Khalid, R.U., and Seuring, S., 2019. Analyzing base-of-the-pyramid research from a (sustainable) supply chain perspective. Journal of Business Ethics, 155(3), pp.663-686.
Koberg, E., and Longoni, A., 2019. A systematic review of sustainable supply chain management in global supply chains. Journal of cleaner production, 207, pp.1084-1098.
Kusi-Sarpong, S., Gupta, H., and Sarkis, J., 2019. A supply chain sustainability innovation framework and evaluation methodology. International Journal of Production Research, 57(7), pp.1990-2008.
Meredith, J.R., and Shafer, S.M., 2019. Operations and supply chain management for MBAs. Wiley.
Nayak, R., Akbari, M., and Far, S.M., 2019. Recent sustainable trends in Vietnam’s fashion supply chain. Journal of cleaner production, 225, pp.291-303.
Panigrahi, S.S., Bahinipati, B., and Jain, V., 2019. Sustainable supply chain management. Management of Environmental Quality: An International Journal.
Plant, A., Hammadi, A., Taylor, R., Reiners, T., and Wood, L., 2019. A classification of deception in operations and supply chain management: A case study of fraud in Australian souvenir markets. In the 26th EurOMA conference.
Saberi, S., Kouhizadeh, M., Sarkis, J., and Shen, L., 2019. Blockchain technology and its relationships to sustainable supply chain management. International Journal of Production Research, 57(7), pp.2117-2135.
Seuring, S., Brix-Asala, C., and Khalid, R.U., 2019. Analyzing base-of-the-pyramid projects through sustainable supply chain management. Journal of cleaner production, 212, pp.1086-1097.
Taghikhah, F., Voinov, A., and Shukla, N., 2019. Extending the supply chain to address sustainability. Journal of Cleaner Production.
Yeoman, R., and Santos, M.M., 2019. A complex systems model for transformative supply chains in emerging markets. International Journal of Emerging Markets.