Nursing
Nursing: NIEHS Guidelines
Nursing entails a great deal of responsibility. Thus, to encourage a healthy lifestyle, NIEHS’s missions are to investigate how the world affects people. Notably, various guidelines assist in ensuring lives are better among individuals of all kinds (Lyden, 2017). Professional practice recommendations are systemically established statements that help practitioners’ decision-making in particular clinical situations in effective healthcare. Guidelines should be used to eliminate inappropriate practical differences and facilitate the provision of high-quality healthcare. Therefore, some of these guidelines include; maintaining privacy and patient confidentiality, promoting well-being/health, and promoting social justice.
Guideline for Promoting Health and Well-being
Patients are given the knowledge to maintain and eventually improve their well-being through the practice of health promotion. The working environment makes regular contact with a patient easy to use as an educational tool. For instance, during a child’s wellness visit, a nurse will inform new parents on their child’s next vaccines. Or a physician will take some time to treat a foot ulcer linked to diabetes to look at tips and tricks to regulate blood sugar levels in a patient. Providing reliable information to patients will help them achieve more robust health management when advocating for a healthier lifestyle. The impact on healthcare costs may also be significant.
The focus of health promotion is on solving health concerns in a holistic way rather than educating individuals about behaviors that impact their health. Persons are also aware of wellness behaviors that they should make (exercise) routines or avoid (e.g., smoking). Health promotion is more concerned, however, with obtaining access for safe behavior change to services. For instance, nurses may also promote social improvements to eliminate resource gaps that could inhibit health promotion at a much higher level. In my daily practice as a nurse, this particular guideline will help educate parents on the importance of health and well-being promotion.
Guideline on Promoting Social Justice
Core nursing principles and public health nursing foundations are referred to as social justice. The philosophy of social justice calls for the preservation of moral, ethical, and humanistic health-related values. As such, social justice education needs to be a framework for a moral theory of development. A health care professional’s role is to understand all the complexities of a patient’s difficult situation. The role of an ethically aware, socially sound nurse is to live by and by the care of every patient’s pledge to uphold the ‘Nursing code of ethics.’ All nurses adhere to a code of ethics developed by the American Nurses Association (ANA), which governs nursing decision-making. One of these ethical responsibilities is the need for healthcare practitioners to take action in the event of social injustice. My goal is to enable every patient to achieve his full health potential from a nursing perspective. However, because of the high premium deductibles and prescription expenses, many medical care procedures are prohibitive. Other inequalities, such as lack of access to quality food and technology, can also restrict a patient’s overall performance.
Examples of social institutions are educational services such as private clinics and hospitals. Creating health facilities to help people live longer and happier lives is the ultimate goal since they provide supportive welfare programs. In turn, these institutions’ shifts have effects on people, such as nurses, community members, policymakers, and patients. The organizations become more available for everyone through input, such as lobbying for lower healthcare rates, personalized care planning, and reporting wrongdoing. This particular guideline will assist me in my daily practice to ensure every patient receives complete health promotions.
Guideline for Maintaining Privacy and Patient Confidentiality
Privacy and confidentiality are especially important to establish and maintain an effective and respectful therapeutic relationship. The right to privacy is social in that it encourages the explicit discussion of health problems between physicians and patients. Ethics and privacy analysis also provide basic social advantages. For clinical science, the promotion of human health and well-being is important. Adequate research studies must protect and safeguard the interests of patients involved in the survey. The most significant justification for preserving personal privacy is the defense of human rights.
In contrast, community support focused on health-research is the main explanation for collecting identifiable personal health (Shenoy & Appel, 2017). It is important, however, to stress that privacy at the social level is important. It facilitates the introduction of complex procedures, including research programs and public health facilities, in ways that protect human dignity.
One of the most critical medical pillars is patient confidentiality. Therefore, the basic relationship of trust between the physician and a person must remain a matter of moral respect. In terms of patient safety and confidentiality, higher quality of data is important. The equation is simple: improving the quality of knowledge means improving medical treatment/patient care. As patient protection and confidentiality are guaranteed in return, the ability to easily synthesize vast amounts of data is one of the digital era’s advantages. However, the data used should be reliable. As a nurse, I will ensure patient safety and confidentiality is maintained in my daily practice. I will create a proper relationship based on trust with my patients.
In conclusion, the principal advantage of recommendations is to increase the standard of treatment received by patients. Although rigorous tests have shown that clinical practice recommendations can enhance the quality of care, it is not clear if they do so daily.
References
Lyden, P. (2017). Using the national institutes of health stroke scale: a cautionary tale. Stroke, 48(2), 513-519.
Shenoy, A., & Appel, J. M. (2017). Safeguarding confidentiality in electronic health records. Cambridge Q. Healthcare Ethics, 26, 337.