Peer Review Experience
Name
Institution
Date
Peer Review Experience
Introduction
The assignment is entirely concerned about collaborative interactions, teamwork, and peer reviews. The three terms may seem to be addressing a similar issue, but they completely different. Importantly, the three aspects contribute significantly to achieving the group’s goals.
Comfort level while collaborating
In the past, I could spend time getting used to peers while engaging in a collaborative activity, more so if the members I was assigned to work with were known to me. There was much tension and uneasy feeling when giving out opinions. However, the situation could improve with time after interacting with peers and making close contacts consistently. Again, it was much challenging to bring up another topic that was different from the one on the table. Overall, I was slightly uncomfortable while interacting with peers, but the comfort level could improve as we continued to socialize.
Collaboration enjoyment
I only enjoyed collaborating with the persons whom we previously had close engagements. Among the significant reasons I enjoyed engaging in groups is that we could bring out diverse opinions, thereby making informed decisions. Besides, collaborative engagement was far much useful since we could share social-economic experiences. It worth noting that we could possibly get to know different perspectives on approaching issues. Melis, Song, De Cristofaro & Shmatikov (2019) support collaborative interaction by suggesting that the outcome of a single individual is half of what a group can achieve. At this point, I always advocate for presenting fundamental ideas before peers, rather than handling it individually.
Examples of experiences
I have encountered a series of adventures, both health and unhealthy. A considerable number of groups I engaged in turned out to be productive. For instance, the collaboration process aided in identifying flaws early in advance, hence boosting the group’s productivity. Equally, it was motivating to work within collaborators who could share opinions openly. Some of the collaborative groups I participated in was composed of indecisive decision-makers (Sawyer, 2017). These kinds of collaborators spend a lot of time before coming into consensus with others. When in this situation, it was much challenging to predict the future of the group.
Differences in teamwork, collaboration, and peer review
The process of organizations or individuals working collectively to achieve a specific goal is referred to as collaboration. Collaboration requires leadership, although it is socially decentralized, and it may be, to some extent, equated to cooperation (McEwan et al., 2017). Teamwork is a collaborative effort applied by a group to achieve a common goal in the most effective way. It requires a firm group’s cohesiveness in addition to interdependence to attain a common objective (Sawyer, 2017). On its part, peer review is the process of analyzing work done by one or two individuals in making decisions. Peer reviews are purposely done to improve performance as well as maintaining quality standards.
Personal goals
Among the critical goals after pursuing peer review collaboration course is to begin writing as a communal act for the public’s benefit, rather than doing it for my sown gain. It hurts to learn that most of the students write papers which can only make sense to themselves, rather than a foundation for others during a research (McEwan et al. 2017). Importantly, I will utilize the course to ensure that I gain significantly in handling audience related speeches. Again, it would be much encouraging once I improve my communication skills, both professionally and socially. The last goal I want to attain is boosting my social networking with peers as well as instructors, which will act as a central driver for accessing opportunities.
References
Melis, L., Song, C., De Cristofaro, E., & Shmatikov, V. (2019, May). Exploiting unintended
feature leakage in collaborative learning. In 2019 IEEE Symposium on Security and Privacy (SP) (pp. 691-706). IEEE.
McEwan, D., Ruissen, G. R., Eys, M. A., Zumbo, B. D., & Beauchamp, M. R. (2017). The
effectiveness of teamwork training on teamwork behaviors and team performance: a systematic review and meta-analysis of controlled interventions. PloS one, 12(1).
Sawyer, K. (2017). Group genius: The creative power of collaboration. Basic books.