This essay has been submitted by a student. This is not an example of the work written by professional essay writers.
Exercising

Reading Evaluation Questions

This essay is written by:

Louis PHD Verified writer

Finished papers: 5822

4.75

Proficient in:

Psychology, English, Economics, Sociology, Management, and Nursing

You can get writing help to write an essay on these topics
100% plagiarism-free

Hire This Writer

 

Reading Evaluation Questions

            Robert Nozick believed that liberty and justice was based on the natural rights of an individual. Natural rights are rights that an individual possesses, and they cannot be interfered with; it would be a violation of the rights. Individuals possess natural rights because of their existence; they were not allocated by the authority. For instance, liberty, life and happiness. Philosophers like Locke, believed that human beings are entitled to preserve their lives, which is a natural right. He believed that these rights are assured by God and nature. Nozick argued that human beings are not permitted to exchange their natural rights for favours. On the negative side, natural rights do not leave enough room for the government because of the self-ownership aspect.

  1. H. Green’s theory was based on moral freedom. His version of liberty and justice leaned towards positivity. However, he divided the rights into positive and negative freedom. He believed that it is mandatory for human beings to have free will in most aspects of their lives. Positive freedom involves surpassing one’s expectations and potential. Negative freedom involves avoidance of any form of interference from outside forces; hence the ultimate satisfaction of an individual’s desires. Green’s theory was focussed on morals and ethics, as opposed to law.

I resonate more to T.H. Green’s theory as opposed to Nozick’s approach. Green’s point of view is easier to relate to because human beings face morality issues every day. Additionally, the exclusion of the state in natural rights may result negatively for the individuals. The purpose of the state is checks and balances; hence it is vital that these rights are regulated. I agree that human beings should preserve their lives and that natural rights are assured by God, but there should be limits to exercising these rights to have a peaceful state.

  Remember! This is just a sample.

Save time and get your custom paper from our expert writers

 Get started in just 3 minutes
 Sit back relax and leave the writing to us
 Sources and citations are provided
 100% Plagiarism free
error: Content is protected !!
×
Hi, my name is Jenn 👋

In case you can’t find a sample example, our professional writers are ready to help you with writing your own paper. All you need to do is fill out a short form and submit an order

Check Out the Form
Need Help?
Dont be shy to ask