Reply to Melanie Bailey,
I agree with your findings of the study of health empowerment among immigrant women in transnational marriages in Taiwan. To conduct such a study, methods should be employed. One can choose either qualitative or quantitative research methods. In your study, participatory action research and in-depth interview were appropriate to conduct a study on health empowerment among immigrant women in Taiwan (Yang et al., 2015). The aim of the study should also be outlined whereby the purpose of the study you conducted was evaluating a theory-based intervention designed to promote increased health empowerment for marriage migrant women in Taiwan.
Works Cited
Yang, Y.-M., Wang, H.-H., Lee, F.-H., Lin, M.-L., & Lin, P.-C. (2015). Health empowerment among immigrant women in transitional marriages in Taiwan. Journal of Nursing Scholarship, 135-142.
Reply to Jaimee Ussery,
I agree with your findings on course content related to chronic wounds in nursing degree programs in Spain. In your study, you used a cross-sectional design. A cross-sectional design entails looking at a single phenomenon across multiple populations at a single point in time, with no intention for follow-up in design. From the study, it is clear that pressure ulcers and chronic wounds are recurring skin integrity issues for patients. There should be education given about pressure ulcers in Spain’s nursing programs (Romero-Collado et al., 2014).
References
Angel Romero-Collado, Ph.D., MSc, RN1, Marta Raurell-Torreda, Ph.D., MSc, RN2, Edurne Zabaleta-del-Olmo, MSc, RN3, Erica Homs-Romero, RN4, & Carme Bertran-Noguer, Ph.D., MSc, RN. (2014). Course content related to chronic wounds in nursing