Student’s Name:
Professor’s Name:
Course:
Institution Affiliation:
Date:
Response One
From your post, power and influence are purveyed to have negative presumptions from a majority of the people. Those in powerful positions perpetuate an abrasive and intimidating attitude and are profoundly inept of flexibility owing to the all-knowing egocentric perceptions. Bobby Knight, for instance, would not subdue his arrogance and belittling demeanor. You out rightly depict Knight’s suppressive endeavors to ascertain retention of his position and, consequently, persistently win games. Those in power use their stature to fortify their necessities through a ridicule and torture approach with a purview that they have already proven the worth of their brands, and no other worthwhile individual can affect similar obligations. You reveal a necessitation of power balance in enhancing efficacies in decision-making and leadership roles. Trivialities arising from power abuse implicitly instigates dejection from subordinates, and the intended motives leading to forceful pressures dissemination essentially results in diminished gains. By all means, leaders are to evade such pervasive leadership tactics.
Response two
From your post, it is evident that there should be a cohesive interrelation between team members striving to conglomerate their capabilities to perform certain duties. There is a revelation that sharing of goals reinforces mutual bonds, easing active pursuits towards a particular endeavor. The Kansas City Chiefs, for instance, enhances and boosts team morale by incentivizing players’ earnings who play tremendous roles in team budding and consequential retention of Cups. You articulately depict a cognitive variation of teams and groups. Teams are structured on sharing common goals and are comprised of like-minded individuals, whereas in groups, there is meager clarity on the commonness of pursuits.