SOPs Beneficial or Tangential in Decision Making
Introduction
The decision-making process entails significantly different concepts and understanding that would help an individual make the most concrete decision that would affect their performance positively. However, the aspect of making decisions may lie between two options, and these involve the reliance of experience in making discretionary decision-making, which would establish a significant impact and influence on the continued impact and importance of individuals. The second alternative that would act in line with making decisions involves the adherence to policies and standard operating procedures as laid out by the agency.
Based on the article information and significant influence, discrete decision making requires continued and improved performance of professionals, which helps them make valuable decisions and which would influence their performance (LaFrance & Day, 2013). As per my judgment, it would be important that the criminal justice professionals adhere to the policies and standards operating procedures as laid out by the agency. Relating the decision-making approach with police agencies and the criminal justice agencies, there are significantly different approaches that make these two distinct and which would not foster a similar approach to discrete decision making.
The most important aspect of making a discrete decision within the criminal justice professionals is the avoidance of conflict of interest. Making a judgment requires limited personal engagement and would require fair involvement and creation of a significant impact on the most critical decisions. Relying on an individual experience would have significant conflicts as to the decisions made and how well these individuals would have a considerable approach and impact. An excellent example of discretion in decision making would be the follow-up of similar cases within the judicial process and in the process of making critical decisions. In such a situation, the use of discretion would become valid and hence limit the conflict of interest.
References
LaFrance, C., & Day, J. (2013). The role of experience in prioritizing adherence to SOPs in police agencies. Public Organization Review, 13(1), 37-48.