The American gun control laws
The American gun control laws have ever since been regarded as the basis for crime reduction over the years. However, the establishment of the gun control law has undergone several amendments capturing the need for the possession of guns for special groups.
The gun control Act of 1968 strictly prohibits the procumbent of or possession of firearms by people who involuntarily committed to drugs or have mental health issues. As explained in the gun control Act, all dealers why are federal in firearms licensees are required to imply a background check on the legality of the weapons posted by individuals. Despite all these gun control measures, there has been a series of crime-related misuse of firearms.
It is evident, therefore, that gun control is not perfectively efficient when it comes to the power of everyday crimes. In this regard, the paper provides some opposing insight on the need to possess licensed firearms, especially for wealthy people, so as to enhance their personal safety. The concern on how to make the country safer from the violence and assassinations has downed on the lawmakers to understand that very few or now of these mass killings are caused by people in possession of guns. Due to the illegality in acquiring guns, the state has never had good statistics to explain how many guns are in circulation, especially for the private entities. Licensed firearms can be easily monitored, and this reduces the chances of firearm misuse.
The ongoing heated debate that guns escalate the rate of crimes in society has no basis as most of the crimes result due to unresolved political and economic concerns. The loopholes in legislation have even triggered the misuse of guns. Guns given as gifts for the person who has shown exam plenary performance in the army are ill-directed. Such individuals may not follow the law that governs the use of firearms in the state. I, therefore, advocate a full check and balances by the gun licensing firms to provide guns only to people whose assessments have shown the need to possess the guns
.As explained in the article: large capacity magazines should not be banned; it is clear as emotional rhetoric. The large-capacity magazine does not enhance murderers to kill large numbers of people, as stated. Therefore the debatable argument that having 15 bullets in a single magazine instead often makes a gun lethal has no basis. It is what is in the heart of the murders that drive him or her to kill and not what is in their hands. While it stands to be true that if there were no guns, there would be no gun accidents, a bare magician gun-free nation is impossible to achieve. It is, however, a fact that fatal gun accidents have drastically decreased over the years. Although every household has dangerous items such as household cleaners, swimming pools, which are as well causing more death as opposed to gun use.
Research has revealed that a person does not commit murder or robbery just because he or she has a weapon available; instead people choose to commit crime and theft and then choose the means to do so. It is out of an angered mind that people decide to commit robberies, not because they have guns. It worth noting that America has a violent culture and not a gun culture. Weapons are used by passionate people much more frequently and not that guns make violent people. There are real social issues in the country that compel people using guns. Self-defense and gun ownership are long and cherished traditions in the United States, and surrendering them does not guarantee a safe society.