The case of Whiznet Company and Tom
As a plaintiff of the Whiznet Company, the first step I would take against Tom is to make the legal document that he signed that is starting with the quotation. After taking the reports owing to the signature of both parties that were indicating both Tom and the company had an agreement, I would collect them and present them to a lawyer for the essence of viewing them. The importance of giving the documents to the lawyer is to enable us to know whether we can proceed to the court to know whether the company can claim some of Tom’s personal property, in essence, to compensate the company for the work done for Tom yet he did not pay as per the agreement. Apart from just presenting the documents, I would also give the property owned by Tom, and this was because during the signing of the agreement Tom agreed to share with us the property that he holds that would help the company have confidentiality with him that he would pay for the work after it was due.
A letter of demand from a lawyer to Tom
This letter of demand I represent Tom indicates all the requirements needed by Tom that he owes the Whiznet Company. It shows that Tom had a written agreement with the company of which he signed, and even in the first place, he had paid his deposit, illustrating that he was committed to paying the remaining amount after the work was done. Tom went further and told the company that he had various essentials that would help him pay for the remaining work, that is, if the money he was expecting to pay with was not available. This shows that Tom had agreed as per the agreements with the company that he would spend the company the remaining amount whether he had the amount or not. Failure to pay the amount the company will present a petition to the court illustrating that Tom had refused to pay the company their agreed amount and of which the company would claim its funds by compensating themselves with the property that he mentioned would enable him to repay them. Failure to adhere to the company’s agreements, the company will proceed forward and issue a petition against Tom claiming back their money.
From not getting the company’s funds from Tom through the use of the agreement, I would use the local court to claim the company’s rightful share from Tom. The local courts are very suitable in our case. This is because looking at the fact that we would be presenting to the court against Tom and according to their terms, then the court, in a substantial way, rhymes with the requirements we need from them. The court is also suitable because our case is not that complicated; it is just between a customer and the company whom they had a written agreement with, but the customer did not follow the company’s transactions as per the quotation they had signed. On presenting the claims that the company has against Tom, the first thing I would do is collect all the documents that the company had signed with Tom that claims that Tom had an agreement with the company. Apart from just the materials, I would also present the information that Tom gave the company that is regarding the compensation, if he had paid the remaining amount through the use of cash then he claimed that he would use his personal property of which he told the company that he would with.
Upon obtaining a court petition against Tom in the local, there are some various options that I would advise Whiznet Company to claim against Tom. The first thing I would recommend them is that they should stick with the signed agreement that they had with Tom and make sure that the court favors them on behalf of the contract. Apart from just the agreement, there is also essential information that Tom had given the company claiming that if he was not able to pay the remaining amount, there were various essentials that he would consider in repaying the company the other remaining amount. Tom had claimed that he owned a new Toyota RAv4 motor vehicle, he also claimed that he owned surfboards worth of $20000 and apart from that he had a job that was paying $60000 annually meaning that the company had full trust in Tom for funding the work that they had agreed on. Through the use of these petitions am sure that the court would rule the case on behalf of the Whiznet Company.
The of Jiang and Tiger Moth Motors
In this case of Jiang and Tiger Moth Motors, this company that sold the car to Jiang has conducted an offense no only to Jiang but also to all those read these advertisements of their commodities that they provide to people. Apart from that, the company has committed an offense where they are selling products that are as per their standards. This is because what the customers receive, one of them being Jiang is not as per the descriptions of the advertisement. This means that Jiang can have the mordacity and go forward to claim against the company for what they are selling is not as per the description of their products. The first thing that Jiang can go against the Tiger Moth Motors Company is that he can claim a petition against them where they are being paid for products that are not as per their descriptions. This is because looking at the car that Jiang bought from the company is far way different from their stories, this is even beginning with the characteristics of the vehicle where the company says that their car is fuel efficient meaning that it cannot consume a lot of fuel, but upon Jiang buying the car, he came to find out that the car’s description on the consumption of fuel is not as per the report. Another characteristic of the vehicle that does not rhyme with the car’s story is that the airbags he thought were safe as he was driving he came to discover that they were very dangerous and they could injure him in case of an accident. Apart from the airbags from being critical on how they explode dangerously also the air conditioning is not that effective as per the descriptions. Looking on all these analyses that Jiang came to find he has more than enough evidence to go against Tiger Moth Motors, this means that if he was to go to any court she could have the opportunity to win the case over the company and this is because the products that they are selling to their customers is not as per their descriptions. This means that they are going against the law and which means that the products they are selling have not been approved, which means it’s a very illegal obligation and work that they are doing.
Through these descriptions that we have acquired above of how the Tiger Moth Motors has been selling goods that have been approved and above all, these products are not as per their descriptions on what the customer’s receive. This means that the Jiang can claim a petition against the manufacturer for delivering products that are not as per their specifications and which are not of high quality. Firstly, the airbags that have been fitted in the vehicle they are not safe for they explode in case of an accident they can injure anyone. This gives Jiang another obligation to claim against the manufacturer for selling to him a product that is not good for use for his safety. And also, we have a description of the fuel consumption where the manufacturer claims that the vehicle can consume five little per one hundred kilometers. Still, after driving the car, Jiang came to discover that the car can drink nine liters per one hundred kilometers, which is far much double than the description of the vehicle. Another issue we have is where the product that they manufacture is claiming to be pocket effective for the customer when the customer buys the product.
Apart from fuel capable, we have the air conditioner not as per the description from the advertisement. This means that Jiang has enough evidence to claim against the manufacturer for selling a product that does not rhyme with its report and the necessary authorities do not approve the product that the manufacturer is selling to the customers this is because if the police had accepted the products, then it means that the product’s description would be rhyming with the vehicle that Jiang Bought. This means that the company is already doing an offense that the authorities can accuse even them for selling products that are have not been approved. The type of legislation that should be used is the joint legislation for how the company is selling products that have not been approved by the authorities. This legislation is necessary to protect the customer who is Jiang and also claim a petition against the manufacturer.