The Reliability and Validity of the Articles.
The three articles describe the causes of cardiac arrest in different environments and impacts on humans. Research on the survival rates and neurological outcomes from the administered treatment by paramedics is the main objectives (Huang et al. 2014). After three experiments were conducted, similar results are obtained. However, the articles conclude that both out-of-hospital and in-of-hospital cardiac arrest is the primary cause of death experienced in the world. Consistent information shows that Cardiac arrest is mainly caused by disorganization of heart rhythm, resulting in a challenge of active blood pumping in the body. Accurate information is provided by the articles stating that defibrillation comes as a result of electric shock therapy (Davis et al. 2016). Consistencies in the mortality rates data have been recorded. The arrest is addressed with high expertise to help the patient recover. Besides similar arguments have been expressed on the importance of chest compressions which play a significant role in helping the heart pump blood rich in oxygen.
Cardiac arrest concepts and theories of research in the articles are well-founded. The relationship between defibrillation time and survival rate is significant (Hunt et al. 2018). Consequently, the articles research results illustrate what happens in the real world. Without a doubt, research outcomes support the theoretical knowledge highlighted. Standard measures recommended by health experts are the same guidelines used in conducting researches mentioned by the articles. Therefore, the articles provide reasonable information on Cardiac arrest. Relevant facts are well explained in the sections helping the world understand the problem of Cardiac arrest in details. The articles have adequately addressed necessary measures towards giving patients the required care. The extent at which the articles analyze the issue of Cardiac arrest shows their ability to be relied on for valid transformation.
References.
Davis, D., Aguilar, S. A., Sell, R., Minokadeh, A., & Husa, R. (2016). A focused investigation of expedited, stack of three shocks versus chest compressions first followed by single shocks for monitored ventricular fibrillation/ventricular tachycardia cardiopulmonary arrest in an in‐hospital setting. Journal of hospital medicine, 11(4), 264-268.
Huang, Y., He, Q., Yang, L. J., Liu, G. J., & Jones, A. (2014). Cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) plus delayed defibrillation versus immediate defibrillation for out‐of‐hospital cardiac arrest. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, (9).
Hunt, E. A., Duval-Arnould, J. M., Bembea, M. M., Raymond, T., Calhoun, A., Atkins, D. L., … & Andersen, L. W. (2018). Association between time to defibrillation and survival in pediatric in-hospital cardiac arrest with a first documented shockable rhythm. JAMA network open, 1(5), e18264