The Standard of Intuitive Appeal
The standard of intuitive appeal is whereby the psychologists evaluate the arguments using the reasons. John Mill defined the standard of intuitive appeal as the use of moral appeals to back up the arguments using the facts. He uses the term “proof” to refer to the evidence that should accompany the argument.
From the theories we learned from the class, I choose the two theories, which are the theory of ethics, and the theory of moral responsibility. In the theory of ethics, Mill argues that individuals’ responsibilities determine the ethical dimensions in society. If all people within society observe ethical dimensions, there would be no conflicts. It relates to the standard of intuitive appeal that for an ethical society, people should back up their arguments using the facts and not myths. On the moral principle theory, Mill argues that happiness makes everything alright. The people their level of happiness determines the moral status of the people. It relates to the standard of initiative appeal that for people to be happy, they should understand some concepts with the examples.
The standard of intuitive appeal is a reasonable standard of moral theory evaluation. The moral dimensions are defined by the way people present themselves within the community. Since the standard of intuitive appeal is all about proofing the argument you say, it makes sense to the society in defining morality as since every person will have a reason about why he or she is doing a certain thing. Understanding the standard of intuitive appeal makes the people within the society talk sense and hence upgrading moral behavior.
Question 2
Intentions and Consequences
Intentions and consequences is an argument brought by John Mill that defines the consequences which people face when they do things intentionally in a given society. The theory of utilitarianism can be used to best explain intentions and consequences. In utilitarianism theory, the right or the wrong thing depends on the consequences of the outcomes of choosing a certain action or activity over the other. The theory is highly used to describe the ethical morality within the community or society. In short, utilitarianism defines intentions and consequences in that whatever you do have consequences either as at the individual level or at the community level.
The most plausible theory that stresses the significance of the consequences of our choices is the ethical morality theory. In this theory, the morality of individuals is defined by the choice they make. If someone does things intentionally, he or she should expect to face the relevant consequences. For instance, if someone tends to steal, he or she should expect that at the end of it, they would be caught and face the consequences.
From the study of the two theories, I think they should focus more on the intentions than in consequence. Utilitarianism and ethical morality theories define individuals by the choices they make intentionally. If the community teaches the members on the choices they should make in their lives, then the consequences will always be positive. That is why psychologists should focus on the intentions part in addressing the behavior of the society or the community. With this, all people will be able to do what is right, and the general outcomes of the society will be likely to be positive.