Whether the United States women should be registered for selective service when they turn 18 years
The thesis generated by the writer is whether the United States women to be registered for selective service when they turn 18 years or not. Nevertheless, the writer posits that these are crucial moments in the history of women in the US military, with the path cleared not only for full gender integration of the armed forces but for women in combat roles. Women can also be as good as men in various roles, for instance, military and combat roles. This thesis statement is clear and concise since it plainly states a position and the reasons for the position. Some claims are being asserted by the writer. Regarding the assertions, they include, invalidating the exclusion of women in the selective service, more equitable institution for the military on which women would be registering. Moreover, women have involved in combat situations even though they were officially banned from combat.
The assertions fully support the thesis statement, for instance, the Supreme Court ruling on the subject will not take long to come up with the relevant verdict. Moreover, women shoulder similar burdens to men throughout the military bureaucracy. The assumptions made are acceptable. The assumptions include, women carry similar burdens to men throughout the military bureaucracy, many marines fear that gender integration will mean lowered standards and the strongest oppositions comes from Special Operations forces. Furthermore, some terms have been used by the author, they are more broad and clear since their functions and meanings have been put forward. For example, Marine corps whose main objective is to champion female inclusion, Special Operation forces that raise the stakes for excellence in performance among others.
The argument has been supported by various reasons, for example, equality in roles is important, albeit, other categories like the Marine Corps and the Special Operations forces criticize the gender roles will lead to lowered standards. Women embrace the principle that equal rights bring with it equal duties. Regarding this, women and men share responsibilities in the workplace and beyond. Nevertheless, the appropriate examples have been used acting as evidence of the arguments. Additionally, some statistics have been used to support the argument. For example, in December 2015, 85% of the Special Operations forces believed that women should stay away from special operations jobs. According to various sources, these statistics are accurate, relevant, and complete.
The authorities have been cited to embed on the evidence provided by the authoritative testimony. Regarding this, they include, 1994 Departmental of Defense Direct Ground Combat Definition and Assignment Rule, which have been used to show how women were not permitted to units below the brigade level. Also, special operations forces have been used as an authority to provide evidence and they are experts on this topic hence regarded as impartial. The logic is apparent whereby inductive reasoning has been used. This is because the experiences and observations learned from the evidence are synthesized hence bringing up the truth regarding women in the US. The writer is fair since he has talked about the importance of including women in combat and military jobs and he has also pointed out why women are sidelined. The counter-arguments are adequately considered. From the information, the writer is manipulated to not including women in some jobs since others view it as lowering their standard yet in his view campaigns for involving women in all jobs that men perform. Therefore, this may result in manipulating the reader.