WHY IS IT DIFFICULT TO ACHIEVE FREEDOM
“War is Peace. Freedom is slavery. Ignorance is strength. These are the beliefs that the citizens of Oceania ’’according to Orwell’s “1984” reports that community is overseen and controlled by an authoritarian group called the Party and a secretive character called big brother, who could be a fictional character, an imaginary figure that controls citizens’ intellect and their activities. Orwell depicts, each citizen is under steady observation by the authorities, basically by private telescreens. A totalitarian government describes a government marked by a political power which applies supreme and centralized control, and in which the state directs each domain of life. This is often the sort of world that the citizens of Oceania must live in, ruled by panic and terror each day.
Indeed this was a fiction novel since it reminds us how today’s world is, surveillance system such as CCTV cameras being displayed all overplays a colossal portion in our lives. We feel as though we are being observed 24/7 just as Winston and his colleagues were watched on nineteen eighty-four fiction characters. The question that comes in our mind is that are we really free or is there such a thing called freedom? It is impossible to determine whether human beings can be free. I do believe that some freedom is possible, but any attempt to prove freedom through reason or empirical evidence it becomes impossible. All we can do is uncover many of the ways human beings are not free and then hope or have faith that something is left that we may call freedom” (Abdu et al.,2019). This proves that there is no complete freedom; there are rather degrees of freedom. Some societies or people are more liberated than others.
In the regime of 1984 people living in under hard national, they were frustrated, and this made them have fear as well as hatred towards each and the government. People did not have freedom since they were treated with cruelty, and it was hard to know the truth, and this made people live an unstable life. The terror that was enforced by the Party leads to the mind of the people to be unstable. According to the novel ordinary people lived under the mercies of their delusion as well as prejudices since there was no freedom. The working-class people are the only hope in Russia according to 1984, Winston says “that the common man and woman would embrace doublethink as enthusiastically and, without the need for terror or torture, would choose to believe that two was whatever they wanted it to be” (de Jong, 2018). There was no civilization since it was damaged by war, revolution and civil conflict. Winston together with Julia were captured and taken to the prison the police agent called Mr. Charrington reveals them to the police. The reason why Winston was arrested because of interacting with a person who had committed a different crime this clearly shows people had no freedom to do what they wanted, they were restricted to whom they should speak with, by being though to be a criminal he is tortured and starved and he was told to cure himself of insanity so that he could change the way he perceived thing so as to fit in the thinking of Party.He is not given the room to be free and make a decision whether he wants the Party or not, he is forced to be in it and once he agrees then he will be released from the prison.
To start with, the capacity of governments to censor media within the world nowadays may be an essential calculation within the capacity of a totalitarian administration to emerge. Within the society of Oceania, all of the citizens? Considerations and convictions are provided to them, specifically from the government. All of the data approximately generation figures, current wars, and other current occasions all are sifted and affirmed by the government. The individuals don’t listen or know anything that the government does not need them to know. In expansion, the citizens of Oceania take what they listen as supreme truth, never addressing its legitimacy.
There are two parts of freedom to get it, freedom of thought and freedom of activity. It is challenging particularly to attain any freedom of thoughts as Charon states, and without such freedom, there’s no freedom of action. To characterize freedom is the person to control his/her life, the issue that’s raised is, who is in charge?
Do we truly select what we believe, or are we influenced by society? If we are prepared or conditioned or brainwashed at that point, we are not in control, or maybe can be influenced.
In the event, something or somebody controls you, at that point, you’re not free. For occurrence, on the off chance that it is family, society, religion, government or other variables that cause what we think or do, or extremely constrain our choices, then freedom isn’t real.
To proceed, the cutting edge approach in innovation nowadays makes the plausibility of a society in which each perspective of life is observed a reality. In Enormous Brother?s society, each minute of each citizen’s life is always under observation by the frightening presence of telescreens. ? Thought police are always observing over the party individuals to form beyond any doubt that no wrongdoing is ever committed against the Party, not indeed the wrongdoing of considering gravely around the Party, which is named thought crime. Although it seems that having an all careful eye over society like it is delineated within the novel could seem a small distance brought to a few, the new advances in innovation nowadays, like satellites, progressed computers and micro cameras, make such a thing exceptionally achievable (Hossain, 2017). The conferences held in workplaces over the globe illustrate the capacity to realize the exceptional thing that the telescreen characterized in the book.
At last, fundamental cause that would provide rise to a totalitarian government both within the setting of 1984, and Charon’s essay mentioned the individual freedom is absent. “To be free means that the individual is active, not passive is, self-directed rather than directed. The ability to take charge of one’s life does not make sense if thinking is absent” (Kulsum-Binder & Crompton, 2017). The case of big brother, the target was is the disintegration of the family. Within the society of Big Brother, the family unit is something that the Party is truly attempting to devastate. The Party comprehends the courage, reassurance and passionate love that can come from a solid family unit. Since the objective of the Party is total love and commitment to Big Brother and no one else, happy family life fair cannot be endured or allowed to happen. The Party creates groups just like the Spies, which educates young children to turn against their parents and report them to the Thought Police on the off chance that they suspect that their parents not being faithful and entirely committed to the Party.
In conclusion, The thought police in George Orwell’s dystopian novel nineteen eighty-four of criminal psychology and widespread observation through sources, telescreens, and microphones to screen and capture citizens of Oceania who would commit a thought crime is similar Charon’s clarification of freedom. Free thought and free activity, she recognizes that an incredible deal of what we call freedom involves thinking if our thinking may be a result of other influences our freedom gets to be limited.
References
Abdu, K. S., & Khafaga1&2, A. F. (2019). A Critical Discourse Analysis of Mind Control Strategies in George Orwell’s Nineteen Eighty-Four. International Journal of English Linguistics, 9(6), p421.
De Jong, V. E. (2018). Orwell Redivivus? A Comparative Analysis of George Orwell’s Nineteen Eighty-Four and the Trump Presidency (Bachelor’s thesis).
Hossain, M. (2017). Language as the device for psychological manipulation in George Orwell’s Nineteen Eighty-Four: a psycholinguistic analysis. European Journal of English Language and Linguistics Research, 5(8), 25-31.
Kulsum-Binder, R., & Crompton, P. (2017). A Stylistic Analysis of Dystopia: Hopelessness and Disturbance in George Orwell’s Nineteen Eighty-Four.