Why Would Victim Service Programs Want to be Evaluated?
The victim service Program is evaluated to show accountability to a source of funding, directors, and external service network. Evaluation test the feeling of safety in victims. Also, the evaluation ensures that programs gather standardized information. The programs are evaluated to judge if they are actually doing want; they were registered to do. The evaluation also tests the effectiveness of the programs.
Why would victim service programs resist evaluation
The primary reason for evaluation resistance is the fear of monitoring and surveillance of the program. The programs resist being evaluated to avoid exposure of the struggle with scarce resources. Another cause of resistance is that programs fear to lose their funders and other supporters. Programs also resist because they are afraid that evaluation may affect their victims, thus making them feel unsafe. The evaluation seeks a methodical description of factors associated with achievement, while practitioners believe in what works is based on field experience.
Define collaboration and how it is applied
Collaboration refers to the action of a group of people working together for a shared benefit. Evaluation research requires collaboration among funders, researchers, and practitioners. In most cases, researchers develop knowledge that helps to answer practice-driven questions. Practitioners usually use research findings to improve their services, impress funders, and also change their policies.
Identify the benefits and challenges of collaboration research as it related to the evaluation of victim services programs
The biggest challenge of collaboration research is the act of safety and confidentiality of the contributors. Also, Practitioners have the problem of protecting the program from any hint of negativity that may be used against them. Many researchers have created a heritage of mistrust among members of the community as they practice exploitive research, where they concentrate on data collection without giving back to the community. The collaboration of many groups in evaluation increases the accuracy of data collected. Additionally, the researchers consume a lot of time while gathering data in the field.