Your PLAP should contain seven components listed below

Instructions

You are to integrate authoritative sources in the form of appropriate citation and in accordance with APA writing standards based on the required reading thus far in the course and/or peer-reviewed literature available to you in the University research library. The purpose of the PLAP is to objectively examine your current leadership style, abilities, strengths, and weaknesses. Also, you should take a careful inward and candid look at where you are as a leader and envision the future direction of your leadership career.

This plan is to be no less than 10 and no more than 15 pages in length, double-spaced, and written in accordance with APA writing standards.
Moreover, you are required to present a plan that is critically reflective yet scholarly in nature.

Your PLAP should contain seven components listed below:

Statement of personal purpose and values.
An assessment of who I am now.
What I want to achieve
Leadership vision: Summary of leadership strengths and weaknesses (very specific).
Development of an action plan – what to achieve and how to achieve it.

Assignment Objective

Personal Leadership Action Plan (PLAP) requirements and guidelines

Assignment Purpose

For your midterm project, you are to submit a Personal Leadership Action Plan.

Rubric

BU600 Unit 4 Assignment

BU600 Unit 4 Assignment

Criteria

Ratings

Pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeContent & Concepts

BU600-CO4;BU600-CO5

54.0 pts

Ideas and concepts are consistently clear and always well explained. Relationships between concepts and ideas are always discussed fairly and always synthesized in a logical fashion with strong, well-founded supporting arguments. All discussion and arguments are thoroughly supported with research and/or resource materials that are pertinent, valid, and reliable.

49.0 pts

Ideas and concepts are clear and well explained. Relationships between concepts and ideas are discussed fairly and synthesized in a logical fashion with well-founded supporting arguments. Discussion and arguments are supported with research and/or resource materials that are pertinent, valid, and reliable

44.0 pts

Ideas and concepts are reasonably well explained. Discussion and arguments are, for the most part, supported with research and/or resource materials that are pertinent, valid, and reliable relationships between concepts, and ideas are discussed. These could be further strengthened with additional research or resource materials.

38.0 pts

Basic ideas and concepts are presented; however, they are under-developed and poorly explained. There is minimal evidence of a relationship between ideas and concepts. Discussion and arguments are not supported with additional research or research that is pertinent and valid.

33.0 pts

Some basic ideas and concepts are started, but not developed. There is no identifiable relationship between ideas and concepts. There is little or no discussion and/or argument with supporting research.

0.0 pts

There are no developed ideas or concepts. There is no supporting research.

54.0 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeAnalysis

PRICE-P

54.0 pts

Organizes and synthesizes evidence to reveal insightful patterns, differences, or similarities related to focus.

49.0 pts

Organizes and analyzes evidence to reveal insightful patterns, differences, or similarities related to focus.

44.0 pts

Organizes evidence to reveal important patterns, differences, or similarities related to focus.

38.0 pts

Organizes evidence, but the organization is not effective in revealing important patterns, differences, or similarities.

33.0 pts

Describes evidence, but it is not organized and/ or is unrelated to focus.

0.0 pts

Lists evidence, but it is not organized and/ or is unrelated to focus.

54.0 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeWriting Conventions

45.0 pts

The paper exhibits a superior command of written English language conventions. The paper has no errors in mechanics, grammar, or spelling.

41.0 pts

The paper exhibits a strong command of written English language conventions. The paper has no errors in mechanics, grammar, or spelling that impair the flow of communication.

36.0 pts

The paper exhibits command of written English language conventions. The paper has minor errors in mechanics, grammar, or spelling that impact the flow of communication.

32.0 pts

The paper exhibits a limited command of written English language conventions. The paper has frequent errors in mechanics, grammar, or spelling that impede the flow of communication.

27.0 pts

The paper exhibits little command of written English language conventions. The paper has errors in mechanics, grammar, or spelling that cause the reader to stop and reread parts of the writing to discern meaning.

0.0 pts

The paper does not demonstrate command of written English language conventions. The paper has multiple errors in mechanics, grammar, or spelling that cause the reader difficulty discerning the meaning.

45.0 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeAPA

PRICE-I

27.0 pts

The required APA elements are all included with correct formatting, including in-text citations and references.

25.0 pts

The required APA elements are all included with minor formatting errors, including in-text citations and references.

22.0 pts

The required APA elements are all included with multiple formatting errors, including in-text citations and references.

19.0 pts

The required APA elements are not all included. AND/OR there are major formatting errors, including in-text citations and references.

17.0 pts

Several APA elements are missing. The errors in formatting demonstrate limited understanding of APA guidelines, in-text-citations, and references.

0.0 pts

There is little to no evidence of APA formatting. AND/OR there are no in-text citations AND/OR references.

27.0 pts

Total Points: 180.0

Your PLAP should contain seven components listed below

Remember! This is just a sample.

Save time and get your custom paper from our expert writers