The work is complete without errors.
| Content | A-Excellent | B-Above Average | C-Goal | D-Developing | F-Needs Improvement |
| · The work is complete without errors. · Shows exceptional content knowledge which is integrated into new challenges (Brookhart). · Shows an in-depth knowledge of the bitcoin concept, its effect on the U.S. economy and its relation to drugs. · Has one clear-well focused thesis, excellent command of the subject matter as well as evidence of independent thought. · Well organization of thoughts
| · The work contains minor errors. · Shows excellent content knowledge. · Expresses a good knowledge of the Bitcoin concept, its effect on the economy and how it is relating to drug trafficking. · Clear thesis but supporting information is general, excellent command of the subject matter and capacity of independent thought (Brookhart). · Ability to substantiate claims. | · The work contains average errors. · Average content knowledge. · Expresses a standard knowledge of Bitcoin concept, its effect on the U.S. economy and its relationship to drug trafficking. · The thesis is somehow clear, but still, details are missing. There are fair, reasonable command independent thoughts and the inconsistent substation of claims (Brookhart). | · The work contains serious errors. · Low-level content knowledge. · Shows a low-level knowledge in Bitcoin concept, its effect on the U.S. economy and its relationship to drug trafficking. · The thesis is not very clear, and there is a relative absence of independent thought. · The key points are not supported (Brookhart). | · It fails to address the stated objectives. · Not easy to assess content knowledge and close-minded disposition about feedback. · Does not have any knowledge regarding the Bitcoin and how it is linked with drug trafficking. · Unclear thesis with an inadequate command of the subject matter as well as an insufficient substation of claims (Brookhart). | |
| Execution | |||||
| Creative presentation and formatting excellently did (Ito 33). | Well done presentations and formatting. | The presentation was correct in length and formatting also is proper (Ito 43). | A short presentation and lacks creativity—some formatting errors. | Floppy and rushed presentation and lacks effort. Poor formatting. |
Works Cited
Brookhart, Susan M. “Appropriate criteria: key to effective rubrics.” Frontiers in Education. Vol. 3. Frontiers, 2018.
Ito, Hiroshi. “Is a rubric worth the time and effort? Conditions for its success.” International Journal of Learning, Teaching and Educational Research 10.2 (2015).