Amnesty International and human rights watch
NGOs are organizations that are non-governmental, working independently from the government. The organizations are based on citizens and are known as civil societies. They are based on national and international levels serving the purpose of political and social in the community. The nature of the organizations is cooperative. Examples of NGOs that give support to human rights targeting the improvement encouraging the participation of politics are the human rights watch and amnesty international. Although the NGOs are independent, some of them depend on the funds from the government. The NGOs have been in existence for an extended period. In the year, nineteen ten almost one hundred and thirty organizations in the world formed a union of international associations. In the year nineteen forty, the united nations was established, and that is where the non-governmental name associations came about recognizing organizations that are private and intergovernmental. Amnesty International is an example of a large organization that trans national leagues of national gatherings. The other worldwide NGOs participate in the association of the mass. Many NGOs are not as big as the government organizations, but they may, at some point, get funds from international bodies though they have no partnership. The NGOs play the role of sorting out functions by giving data and expert advice to governments and associations that are international on the matters affecting the globe. They also provide the data of the locals that are not accessible by the government. They also serve in advocating for the benefit of policies that are explicitly giving relief to humans and improving lives. The NGOs, too, do the supervision of the rights of human beings and implementing regulations concerning the environment.
Amnesty international
Peter Benenson a lawyer, founded amnesty international in the year nineteen and sixty-one.His original intention was to launch an appeal in Britain to get a pardon for conscious prisoners in the world. The committee that worked for this saw it better to get a document in detail for the categorized prisoners. As they continued working, they saw the need to permanently do the job since the number of prisoners was large, and they were to be taken in the whole world. Amnesty International is a movement in the world working to protect the rights of humans. It is independent; therefore, it does not depend on the government and has a neutral relationship with political groups, religions, and ideologies. The main objective of the movement is to make sure women and men are arrested for their skin color,convictions, faith, and the ethnic group, but they did not use any force or urged others to bring about violence. The prisoners are known as prisoners of conscience.In the year nineteen seventy-seven, the organization declared it to be the year of prisoners of conscience and worked in the collection of signatures appealing to the general assembly of the united nations.
In the first place, amnesty international was a British organization until the year nineteen sixty-three, where an international secretariat was formed. Sean Mac Bride became the chairman of the movement in the year nineteen sixty-three when the organization was expanding fast. Ten years after the organization was established, more than one thousand groups are volunteering in twenty-eight nations. February of the year nineteen seventy-seven, the groups increased to one thousand eight hundred and seventy-four in thirty-three countries. Swede Thomas Hammarberg is the current present chairman of the organization. Amnesty International has also worked against the inhumane and torture for the forgotten prisoners as well as capital punishment. The three tasks by the amnesty international are named as the most important ones for the organization according to the statutes adopted by the organization. The organization developed from one office to a large organization that is in existence today, dealing with human rights self-dependent with a lot of accurate information. The organization celebrated its fiftieth anniversary in the year two thousand and eleven. It focused on the death penalty, freedom of expression,international justice, reproductive rights, and stopping abuse from corporates.
Human rights watch
This is an organization that is powerful with a budget that is prominent linking strictly to the governments in the western region and has an influence that is important in international institutions.The organizations’ publications cater to the lack of professional standards,methods of research and legal experts, and military. Organizations exist in more than forty countries and offices in many countries. The organization is prominent since its origin in the united states with watch committees. The mission of human rights watch is to defend the rights of the people in the world. They watch and do investigations on cases of abuse and bring the facts openly pressuring those who are in power to respect the rights of people and be. The law of humanities guides it with oveementthat is vibrant upholding the dignity of humans advancing the need for human rights. The organization is committed to working on situations that are not easy to handle, giving attention that is long term for an impact that is positive. The organization also plays an essential part in speaking out against attacks on civil society.
Defending the political space where the movements of human rights operate widely by speaking out against attacking civil society is also done by the human rights watch. They serve to investigate and expose violations done on the rights of humans seeking to make the oppressors pay for their wrongs to the international community and their duty under international law. Human rights watch take part in changing the law and some policies to enable the locals to benefit and be active by putting a name to behaviors that are not considered as abusive in the local context. They have a duty of bringing abusers that are overboard at home to be charged in the court of law or international tribunals. Human rights watch tend to target specific people, asin those who harm the abusers but not the whole population. Increasing the price of the abuse of human rights is also don by the Human Rights Watch. They are obliged to bringing more tyrants to justice-making abusers who are potentially thinking twice before committing human rights violations. Our primary purpose is to process the main output of amnesty international and human rights watch on Colombia, which is written and between the period nineteen eighty-eight to two thousand and four. The conflict information and conflict events that are specific are recorded in numbers. The constituency is checked internally against a database, particularly in Colombia. The findings are that both companies that are amnesty international and human rights watch have problems related to substances in the way they handle information on quantity. The issues they face are failing to have specific sources, definitions that are not clear, templates used to report are erratic, and portraying dynamics conflicts in a distorted way. Individual events are accounted for and represented somewhat, making it more critical due to its accuracy than data obtained from statistics. We do not agree with the accusations made o amnesty international and human right watch on their rare critics of the guerillas. Still, We have evidence of being bias on the government.
Amnesty International and human rights watch are the only western-oriented organizations internationally. Human rights organizations operate mostly in situations of severe abuse and oppression worldwide. The main differences between them lie in their structures and methods for change promotions.
A mass membership organization is an amnesty international whose central advocacy is to mobilize those members. The main products of human rights watch are its lengthy reports and researches from the crisis. In contrast, amnesty international writes reports which are detailed and legislated. It also focuses on adopting individuals as “prisoners of conscience,” legislating for their release, and concentrate on mass letter writing. Human rights will specifically legislate for specific actions for other governments to take against the offenders of human rights, including names of specific individuals for arrest, or for sanctions to be imposed against particular countries. It recently called for disciplinary permits against Sudan’s top leaders. They had overseen killings during a campaign in Darfur the group has called for the release of the detained human rights activists in Sudan. The document was produced about the abuse of human rights, which includes an extended analysis of the political and historical backgrounds of the conflicted parties, some of which have been published in academic journals.