Summary and Critique Conservatives and liberals portray diverse mental styles, and joining lines of proof shows that biology impacts variances in their radical beliefs, psychological characteristics, and attitudes. For example, conservatives portray more powerful attitudinal responses of conflict and threat. On the other hand, liberals seek out uncertainty and novelty. Besides, democrats who are liberal take risks more than their Republican counterparts who are politically are conventional. The ideological differences they possess have been contributed by psychological, logical, and social constraints that have primarily focused on the individual rule partialities rather than biological variances in the evaluative progressions. Research instead shows physiological interrelationships between conflict and risk by conservatives and the liberals (Schreiber, Fonzo, Simmons, Dawes, Flagan, Fowler, &