For the juror, I will choose Michael jones
For the juror, I will choose Michael jones. Mr. Jones will be easier to deal with compared to other potential jurors. Despite his age, he is a retired English teacher so that communication will be more fluent. Also, being pessimist, then Jones will be ready to accept any outcome. Having divorced, then he will be easy to handle since he has got no wife-husband love that can make the casing process complicated. Due to his years, Jones has less to manage; thus, he will have enough time to handle the case. Being a retired teacher, he has gained a lot of communication skills that will help in the argument process.
Other jurors should be removed from the jury do to various reasons. Ruth Eagleburger, who is a social worker, will be so interested in the case and will end up making the situation more complicated. Also, having divorces twice, she may be a feminist. Marcos Ortiz, who possesses misogynistic tendencies, may fail to give the case the required weight. Also, having not married shows how he reluctant about women, and the case involves a woman. Mr. John lu, who is the youngest in this category ad, who is a loner, will end up giving less evidence. For a juror to be successful, you must be very social to collect the required information. Also, the many family members who are police officers may interfere with the case and make it difficult. Lastly, Shanique Brown, who is a parole officer, has interacted with a lot of criminals, thus making her gather more information towards justice life. The information may be complicated at a time since many people face imprisonment out of mistaken identity. Due to this, this person may end up confusing the case with a lot of facts rather than evidence.