In this persuasive essay
In this persuasive essay, the argument aims to prove that 911 dispatches are not Clarks. It gives the idea that 911 dispatchers should be considered first responders (Selected post n,d). It is attributed to the type of job they do on a typical day. It proves that they provide irresponsible first-hand help over the telephone. In most cases, they give lifesaving instructions that help in the process. The goal is to enumerate the dangers of the job. It also showcases what they go through in handling specific tasks within the community. Regarding this topic, opposing viewpoints are highlighted and clearly illustrated. In this regard, opposing views consider dispatchers as workers who perform clerical work and are not highly regarded in any work scope. It gives a baseline through which their work is underrated.
Based on sections of the persuasive essay, the risks affecting the dispatchers need to be illustrated to a great length. For example, when the author speculates that “Police and paramedics may see the fallout of traumatizing calls and dispatchers hear it. If a community didn’t have 911 dispatchers, that city would be in some serious trouble.” Clarification has to be made concerning this context. It can otherwise be improved by giving case examples when paramedics experience a fallout. The article has credible and reliable sources through which the arguments in the story are based upon. Some of the resources utilized include materials from the Shapiro Library, different assumptions from the APCO, and interview resources. Either way, these sources are highly related to the main arguments in the essay. Its use makes the information very clear and easy to understand. Counterarguments raised within the paper provide a highly persuasive analogy through which the ideas are based. Besides, the most credible source is the utilization of an article from the APCO, which gives an overview of the whole essay.
References
Selected post n,d[class material]