is the study of the government and politics are scientific enterprise
Question 3
Some people believe that the statement study of the government and politics are scientific enterprise is valid when argued out, but some people state that the statement is not valid. One has to acknowledge that scientists are not ignored; policymakers, in most cases do actively seek out the use of scientific evidence. However, scientists tend to get things wrong and in the explanation of where science and policy mix. In most cases, people are political animals who are always making decisions on acting upon information being rational. There are three dynamics which complicate the ideal relationship existing between the government and politics. The first is the psychological biases which defy the accuracy of information processing. It is followed by the political interests which complete the elites for neglecting and politicizing any unfavourable evidence. The third argument is that there the tendency of human being rejecting evidence-based arguments which favours their moral imperatives. This means that most of the political decision making is mostly about faith basis than facts.
Another factor which undermines the relationship which exists between science and politics and government is in terms of values instead of facts. An example is where Ginges and Atran stated that people that support the policy decisions were products of deontological reasoning. This means that people have to follow a rule-bound logic calling for moral appropriateness without considering the material benefit of such a policy. This argument is countered through certain statements which makes it invalid. So in the case where scientists are willing to create an impact, then there should be a consideration of the way their works could affect the biasness and interest work of the political community.