Levi’s case
While the psychodynamic theory is the preferred approach in Levi’s case, it should be viewed from the associated strengths and weaknesses. The model is reputed for its holistic approach of taking into account both nature and nurture (Blossom, 2017). In other words, the theory emphasizes the importance of evaluating the impact of both attributes on a person’s problems. The model does not require any scientific machinery like an MRI scan to diagnose an individual’s mental illness (Blossom, 2017). Therefore, counselors do not require the use of expensive diagnosis procedures in their practice. Additionally, the theory promotes more optimism concerning mental problems and encouraging the patients to speak up about their psychological distress (Blossom, 2017). By making people optimistic, the theory, thus, empowers them to manage their mental challenges.
Strengths notwithstanding, psychodynamic theory is also associated with some criticisms. The theory is widely criticized for its unscientific approach to analyzing human behavior (Blossom, 2017). In other words, critics view the model as less convincing in its diagnosis procedure. Additionally, the theory is criticized for its inability to be evaluated empirically (Blossom, 2017). Effectively, the model cannot be measured or depended upon by repeated testing. Despite these limitations, the associated strengths make the theory an effective approach for intervening in the issues affecting Levi.