Black Diaspora Cinemas
The black diaspora cinema culture, as depicted through films, happens to be one of the most common means of expression that has been focused on representation. The reason is that the media is simply the largest and presumably the most reliable source of information regarding different people and their various distinct cultural settings. Black diaspora cinemas are created to be able to examine how much the art of making films have impacted the western culture, and towards which direction. The culture of the west as it is known comes out as heavily capitalist, and that means that the production, as well as the distribution methods that are used, have at some point affect the neo-colonialism statuses of those people that reside in the regions in which films are made. So to say, black diaspora cinemas seek to explore not only the cultural but also the ideological, thematic, political, and aesthetic narratives, and even analyzes other aesthetically different films. These cinemas are vital when it comes to African representation and world cinema.
The black diaspora films very often bring out a celebration of diversity as well as the innovation that comes with the making of films from across different parts of the world. These films also elaborate on how historically significant film making is mainly in regards to not only the cultural but also the political forms of a region or a group of people, and especially Africans. One should note that the traditions and standard practices used in black diaspora films are most often derived from the contributions of people in the industry, such as scholars, other filmmakers, and also critics of similar movies. These groups of people can be from any part of the world, including Europe, North America, and even third-world countries. This information as diverse as it is collected is vital for critical reading, and also the need to challenge colonialists with the discourses of the third world films.
Additionally, black diaspora cinemas also depict more about the realities of the African Diaspora, from places such as the United States and Brazil. This is achieved through the ways that these films are directed. In most cases, these films are different, especially in genres, and they may bring out distinct cultures, traditional settings, styles, and even styles of presentation. However, they also share one thing in common: the theme of racial discrimination experienced by the Africans across different white-populated spheres. The issue of discrimination and mistreatment based on race is a leading commercial gain for the film industry, and it also helps boost the African culture in these societies. This, therefore, is one of the most productive ways that they get to communicate their artistic and cultural messages, and in the process, the films also foster a sense of transnational identities as well as dialogues. Filmmakers can use this as a tool to create a similar genre in the industry and use it to convey critical messages that represent the African Diaspora.
Films that depict the most common racism issue at the end of the day acquire the most commercial gain. This is because fans and audiences are thrilled to see these issues about th African diaspora being addressed openly in the black diaspora cinemas. This response has been widely witnessed in box-office sales. People that have originated from African into the world may not be willing to identify as part of this community. As such, there are certain ideologies that a city that is used to seeing only specific messages and information every day may end up disregarding. This means that an individual may not know that the film they are watching is communicating a black diaspora themed message. On a different level, a person that is an outsider can quickly identify the cultural trends that have been used in making these films. Hence audiences relate to these issues in their day-to-day lives, and they may be accurate or not.
Black diaspora films have a crucial role in fostering transnational identities as well as dialogues, especially when it comes to the idea of how one comes and leaves. To the individual that leaves their home country and moves into another, the homeland s represented as a base. The image of corporate functions and how such a situation ay turn out is not based solely on things that are unreal, preferably, from meaning that is derived from their local experiences. (Guarnizo and Smith, 1998). For an individual to identify as a member of this community depicts their identity realization and acceptance, and also defines them by their culture.
The continuous interventions in the public debate have helped in shaping and advancing the development of emerging Black identity trends in Britain. In this way in which Hall’s work accomplished these things from the 1980s through the development of cultural theory while also raising critical questions on the role of film art in the formation and articulation of the Black diaspora identity as a whole. Further questions have been built regarding the part of experimental and conventional forms of cinematic language for the development and expression of emerging identity in 1980s Britain, and also, the purpose of both public and private financing for the establishment of Black British cinema. Hall’s work and involvement with social justice remain meaningful for a more comprehensive understanding of historical ideologies and elaborate materials of upcoming sub-cultures and forms of representation that resist cultural changes in the corporate media societies.
It is important to note that interdisciplinary programs which portray the skills of historians, archaeologists, linguists, social psychologists, and geneticists in seven different projects in an effort to push disciplinary boundaries and establish a better understanding about the consequences of deep time diasporas on the formation of identities in Britain, past and present (Brubaker 2005). During the past two decades, black diaspora films have changed from a term with a somewhat constrained usage to something considerably freer, at the same time, shifting rapidly from political and academic discourse into one that is vernacular. In academia, the word diaspora has come to be applied to almost all populations or groups living away from their homeland. In contrast, in widespread usage, diaspora now seems to be a collective noun used to refer to anyone, not at home
Therefore identity, very similar to the diaspora, has come up from a specific psychological idea and into something that is a keyword in social science as well as humanities. In the process similar to the black diaspora cinema concept, the term has risked losing its meaning as it becomes rather vague for individual or community characteristics (Brubaker and Cooper 2000). The early composition of identity, whether personal or communal, developed a concept somewhat familiar to the homogenous and respected culture of early anthropology; hence a person had a character that developed over time. However, it might undergo constant small changes that would generally be well established by the end of puberty. Similarly, groups also had an identity that all within the group shared and allowed them to define themselves (and be determined by others), such as being Sioux Indians or U.S. Government employees (Erikson [1959] 1994, 22). But much as anthropology has taught people to realize that cultures are neither bounded nor unchanging, so too identity has become a term to describe a set of characteristics to which individuals and groups may differentially subscribe but which are neither fixed either per se or in their relations with the individuals or groups they are intended to characterize or subscribed to universally.
When talking about the black diaspora cinema in a context that is more contemporary, identity can be brought out as something that defines an individual or a community, one that is therefore effectively distinct though quite unstable, somewhat true to the idea of the self or it is used to refer to particular sets of characteristics, that are expressed in specific ways, to which both individuals and groups can attest to in order to establish who they are and to identify themselves from others. Identity relates in this latter definition too, but it is differently illustrated as a rather too political aspect.
Question 4
Using South Africa as a case study, the period of transition to constitutional democracy in South Africa has been one of great hopefulness, vertiginous possibility, and expectation, of quiet sadness and reflection, much joy and celebration, of contradictions and vexing complexity. The breathtaking rendering extent of colonial and apartheid atrocity intelligible but tentatively took place. The lived inscriptions of layer upon layer of sentient injustice had marked every day through the passage of the past three hundred and fifty years in these southernmost parts of the African continent.
In the global political and moral imaginary the new South Africa, there was however either as a miracle of reconciliation in which the moral victory of good which was the struggle against Apartheid that had prevailed against evil white supremacist rule and or as yet another instance of the failure of neoliberal macroeconomics where huge class disparities, social inequity, and structural poverty increasingly paint a gritty canvas depicting the horizons of society as a crisis, despair and struggle.
Both views hold implicit though programmatically incompatible assumptions about time, history, and oppression. They have barely interrogated the light of what remains vexing, creative, resilient, hopeful, human, and, as such, vital in the picture. This work is a consideration of the shaping of time and its effect on living with and understanding issues in South Africa in the wake of the Truth and Reconciliation Commission (TRC). The ways that the institutionalization of memory has managed perceptions of time and transition, of events and happenings, of sense and emotion, violence and recovery, of the past and the coming.
Through this process, a public language of memory has been carved into collective modes of meaning-making. This is a language that seems bereft of the hopes, dreams, and possibilities for the promise of a just and redemptive future it once nurtured people. During this process that has undergirded the truth and reconciliation, narrative key concepts and discourses embedded in and generated through the truth and reconciliation have reproduced and rein scribed through the public sphere. The thoughts and conversations have produced a compelling regime of historical meanings that has contoured social perceptions of political change.
Hence time as a living, which is seen to be an experiential category related, in different ways to memory, and time as a historical category, which is what comes to be represented as the past and what does not? Time in the postcolonial requires theoretical elaboration as it impacts on the ways in which the past as a sign of knowledge and experience is produced. Therefore, the ways in which the truth and reconciliation have organized notions of time in the production of a past and a present. To properly examine the truth and reconciliation as a part of a growing global economy of institutions of political transition management.
We can unpack that a common language of remembrance and reconciliation has come to stand in for a state practice of redress and social debt of responsibility. From this perspective, the referential economies of key discursive terms of the truth, reconciliation, and forgiveness are explored. In theorizing the relationship between forms of public and institutional discourses of transition, social perceptions of time, and subjectivity that these endorse and the material, historical and geopolitical contexts of their production, this chapter interrogates how social and historical meanings are assimilated into the foundational notion of a nation. These have recalibrated perceptions of what is perceived as the political in the postcolonial.
It is also important to note the ways in which testimony and voice have figured in giving life to the idea that time is organized as the new and the past. This involves examining the interconnections of sound to democracy, of atrocity to the narrative, and listening and interpretation to silencing and appropriation. The chapter interrogates how the operative assumptions which frame testimony, how mediations of proof, and how mediatized disseminations of statements have contributed to the depoliticization both of evidence as a narrative genre for radical social change, as well as of memory as a discourse about the past.
Something that cannot be ignored and is central to this discussion is an examination of the ways that pain, trauma, and woundedness operate in the framing of testimony. It is then that theorizing the ways that technologies of mass media have insinuated truth and reconciliation testimonies into the cognitive operations of the public as mediated and mediatized declarations have been rendered into a poetics of pain for public consumption and how this has diluted the interpretative, historical and political substance of testimony and of the act of testifying itself.
Drawing from a selection of televisual coverage of the truth and reconciliation, it is possible to examine how testimonies are absorbed into a depoliticizing economy of witnessing in which discourses of trauma loom large. Instead of enriching, humanizing, and deepening understandings of politics, the ways in which pain is framed displaces the politics that are not necessarily in terms of testimonies content but their broader narratological framing. And finally, it is essential to note and examine the mediation of testimony in relation to how, having been conceived as a discrete corpus of information to be interpreted and rendered into knowledge, testimony is appropriated and delinked from the lives, experiences, and right of recount ability of the witness-narrator as an issue of ethical, political and economic import.
In the case of South Africa as an example, the conceptual category of place and the urban context of Cape Town explore the ways in which constructions of lived and historical time are specialized. This can be developed by thinking how memorial cartographies the routes and networks of emplaced narratives that constellate spatial and temporal relations grounding, materializing and containing historical sensibilities act as topographical mnemonics, inscribing permitted modes of specialized remembrances. Memorial cartographies produce historical meaning, mirroring similar processes of historical visibility and social occlusion that technologies of transition management, such as the truth and reconciliation inaugurate.
References
Adejunmobi, Moradewun, A., 2007. “Nigerian Film as Minor Transnational Practice.” Postcolonial Text, 3 (2):1-16.
Ang, Ien. “Ethnographic and Radical Contextualism in Audience Studies.” Locating Audiences. pp.247-262.
Ajibade, Babson. 2007. “From Lagos to Douala: The Video Film and its Spaces of Seeing.” Postcolonial Text, 3 (2): 1-14.
Allor, M. “Relocating the Site of the Audience.” Critical Studies in Mass Communication, (5): pp.217-233.
Appadurai, A., 1990. “Disjuncture and Difference in the Global Economy.” Theory, Culture & Society, 7:295-310.
Arthur, J. A., 2000. Invisible Soldiers: African Immigrant Diaspora in the United States. Westport, CT: Greenwood Publishing.
Brubaker, Rogers. 2005. “The ‘Diaspora’ Diaspora.” Ethnic and Racial Studies 28 (1): 1–19.
Christopher J. Colvin, “Performing the Signs of Injury: Critical Perspectives on Traumatic Storytelling after Apartheid” (unpublished Ph.D. Dissertation (University of Virginia, 2004).
Eckhardt, Hella, ed. 2010. Roman Diasporas: Archaeological Approaches to Mobility and Diversity in the Roman Empire. Journal of Roman Archaeology Supplementary Series 78. Portsmouth, RI: J. H. Humphrey.
Erikson, Erik H. [1959] 1994. Identity and the Life Cycle. New York: W. W. Norton & Company.
Michael Ian Weeder, “The Palaces of Memory: A reconstruction of District One, Cape Town, before and after the Group Areas Act” (M.A. mini-thesis, University of the Western Cape, 2006).
Scott Veitch, “Reconciliation: Asymmetries and Diversions.” Paper presented to the Time, Law and Reconciliation workshop, University of Johannesburg, December 13, 2004.