This essay has been submitted by a student. This is not an example of the work written by professional essay writers.
Event

Stop and Frisk and the Fourth Amendment

This essay is written by:

Louis PHD Verified writer

Finished papers: 5822

4.75

Proficient in:

Psychology, English, Economics, Sociology, Management, and Nursing

You can get writing help to write an essay on these topics
100% plagiarism-free

Hire This Writer

Stop and Frisk and the Fourth Amendment

The stop and frisk is the stopping of a suspect by the police in a brief and non-intrusive manner. Before stopping a suspect, the fourth amendment requires the police to have reasonable suspicion that the suspect is about to commit the crime or has committed the crime. Upon suspecting a person to be dangerous or armed, the police have reasonable grounds to frisk the outer clothing of the suspect. In the 1968 Supreme Court case, Terry versus Ohio derived terry stop to mean frisking of a suspect. According to Terry, a stop and frisk must be reasonable and comply with the fourth amendment if the suspect poses a danger to the policeman and others.

According to Bandes and other authors, their case study on terry stop mismeasures attributed stop and frisk to psychological and emotional harm of communities and individuals (Bandes et al., 2019). Bandes and other social scientists indicated that the terry stop failed to address the quality and nature of intrusion to human rights. The authors also suggested that the stop and freeze adversely affect the vulnerable groups and individuals hence hindering investigation and prevention of crime by law enforcement agencies (White & Fradella, 2016). Therefore the courts and law enforcement agencies should consider amending the law on stop and frisk to rectify assumptions on its use and prevention of emotional and psychological harm to diverse communities and individuals.

 

 

References

Bandes, S. A., Pryor, M., Kerrison, E. M., & Goff, P. A. (2019). The mismeasure of Terry stops: Assessing the psychological and emotional harms of stop and frisk to individuals and communities. Behavioral sciences & the law37(2), 176-194.

White, M. D., & Fradella, H. F. (2016). Stop and frisk: The use and abuse of a controversial policing tactic. NYU Press.

  Remember! This is just a sample.

Save time and get your custom paper from our expert writers

 Get started in just 3 minutes
 Sit back relax and leave the writing to us
 Sources and citations are provided
 100% Plagiarism free
error: Content is protected !!
×
Hi, my name is Jenn 👋

In case you can’t find a sample example, our professional writers are ready to help you with writing your own paper. All you need to do is fill out a short form and submit an order

Check Out the Form
Need Help?
Dont be shy to ask